<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VMware Zimbra: Integration without Context Shift</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2010/02/04/vmware-zimbra-integration-without-context-shift/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2010/02/04/vmware-zimbra-integration-without-context-shift/</link>
	<description>An industry analyst blog looking at software ecosystems and convergence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:35:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Kleinman</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2010/02/04/vmware-zimbra-integration-without-context-shift/comment-page-1/#comment-551668</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Kleinman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 13:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/?p=2511#comment-551668</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve done some playing with Zimbra, and while a bit of extra development could, I&#039;m sure, make it a more efficient piece of software, I wouldn&#039;t be so quick to pass off it&#039;s performance faults as being a deployment specific problem. It&#039;s sort of a &quot;throw RAM at it and pray,&quot;  problem, and thankfully that works. 

One of the reasons Zimbra gets a bad rap, at least in the circles I travel in, is that the competing UNIX stack (postfix/dovecot/etc.) is a magnitude more efficient on system resources. So it&#039;s the kind of thing that if you need it, you have to be willing to pay for (in some way) and that you probably want to try and avoid unless you really need it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve done some playing with Zimbra, and while a bit of extra development could, I&#8217;m sure, make it a more efficient piece of software, I wouldn&#8217;t be so quick to pass off it&#8217;s performance faults as being a deployment specific problem. It&#8217;s sort of a &#8220;throw RAM at it and pray,&#8221;  problem, and thankfully that works. </p>
<p>One of the reasons Zimbra gets a bad rap, at least in the circles I travel in, is that the competing UNIX stack (postfix/dovecot/etc.) is a magnitude more efficient on system resources. So it&#8217;s the kind of thing that if you need it, you have to be willing to pay for (in some way) and that you probably want to try and avoid unless you really need it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2010/02/04/vmware-zimbra-integration-without-context-shift/comment-page-1/#comment-550078</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/?p=2511#comment-550078</guid>
		<description>Zimbra needs major work to scale beyond the &quot;user lives on a single mail server&quot; model.  I think VMware could provide the resources to do that.

If mail accounts are held in a pool that any ZCS mailbox server can access, then &quot;all&quot; (ha!) you need to do would be to add more Zimbra mailbox vApps to your cluster (assuming hardware resources available)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zimbra needs major work to scale beyond the &#8220;user lives on a single mail server&#8221; model.  I think VMware could provide the resources to do that.</p>
<p>If mail accounts are held in a pool that any ZCS mailbox server can access, then &#8220;all&#8221; (ha!) you need to do would be to add more Zimbra mailbox vApps to your cluster (assuming hardware resources available)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robinsok</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2010/02/04/vmware-zimbra-integration-without-context-shift/comment-page-1/#comment-549992</link>
		<dc:creator>robinsok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/?p=2511#comment-549992</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Analyst commentary on #Zimbra acquistion &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/bf3OBr&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://bit.ly/bf3OBr&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;This comment was originally posted on &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/robinsok/statuses/8965189190&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Analyst commentary on #Zimbra acquistion <a href="http://bit.ly/bf3OBr" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/bf3OBr</a></p>
<p><i>This comment was originally posted on <a href="http://twitter.com/robinsok/statuses/8965189190" rel="nofollow">Twitter</a></i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcgadsdon</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2010/02/04/vmware-zimbra-integration-without-context-shift/comment-page-1/#comment-550873</link>
		<dc:creator>marcgadsdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/?p=2511#comment-550873</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Zimbra&#8217;s ability to integrate without context shift: &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/amVkjq&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://bit.ly/amVkjq&lt;/a&gt; &#8211; my thoughts here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/a1yJaA&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://bit.ly/a1yJaA&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;This comment was originally posted on &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/marcgadsdon/statuses/8960041411&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zimbra&#8217;s ability to integrate without context shift: <a href="http://bit.ly/amVkjq" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/amVkjq</a> &#8211; my thoughts here: <a href="http://bit.ly/a1yJaA" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/a1yJaA</a></p>
<p><i>This comment was originally posted on <a href="http://twitter.com/marcgadsdon/statuses/8960041411" rel="nofollow">Twitter</a></i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Gadsdon</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2010/02/04/vmware-zimbra-integration-without-context-shift/comment-page-1/#comment-549989</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Gadsdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/?p=2511#comment-549989</guid>
		<description>Interesting points James - we&#039;re very excited about the VMWare deal and what it will mean for us and the channel.

We need an extremely strong stack... Does VMWare + Spring + Zimbra do it, no I don&#039;t think so as I believe there are more pieces of the puzzle which need to be added, but it&#039;s a dam good starting point and a much stronger position than where we were last year...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting points James &#8211; we&#8217;re very excited about the VMWare deal and what it will mean for us and the channel.</p>
<p>We need an extremely strong stack&#8230; Does VMWare + Spring + Zimbra do it, no I don&#8217;t think so as I believe there are more pieces of the puzzle which need to be added, but it&#8217;s a dam good starting point and a much stronger position than where we were last year&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VMDigest</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2010/02/04/vmware-zimbra-integration-without-context-shift/comment-page-1/#comment-549736</link>
		<dc:creator>VMDigest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/?p=2511#comment-549736</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;James Governor&#8217;s Monkchips » VMware Zimbra: Integration without &#8230;: Stephen did his usual excellent job of explai&#8230; &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/d6JZJf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://bit.ly/d6JZJf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;This comment was originally posted on &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/VMDigest/statuses/8656275725&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James Governor&#8217;s Monkchips » VMware Zimbra: Integration without &#8230;: Stephen did his usual excellent job of explai&#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/d6JZJf" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/d6JZJf</a></p>
<p><i>This comment was originally posted on <a href="http://twitter.com/VMDigest/statuses/8656275725" rel="nofollow">Twitter</a></i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sapscene</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2010/02/04/vmware-zimbra-integration-without-context-shift/comment-page-1/#comment-549695</link>
		<dc:creator>sapscene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/?p=2511#comment-549695</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;James Governor&#8217;s Monkchips » VMware Zimbra: Integration without &#8230; &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/bxaIFA&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://bit.ly/bxaIFA&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;This comment was originally posted on &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/sapscene/statuses/8654836020&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James Governor&#8217;s Monkchips » VMware Zimbra: Integration without &#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/bxaIFA" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/bxaIFA</a></p>
<p><i>This comment was originally posted on <a href="http://twitter.com/sapscene/statuses/8654836020" rel="nofollow">Twitter</a></i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eXoPlatform</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2010/02/04/vmware-zimbra-integration-without-context-shift/comment-page-1/#comment-549737</link>
		<dc:creator>eXoPlatform</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/?p=2511#comment-549737</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Analysis from @monkchips on why Zimbra is more than just a mail server for VMW &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/bw37Fe&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://bit.ly/bw37Fe&lt;/a&gt; (See where we&#8217;re heading?)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;This comment was originally posted on &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/eXoPlatform/statuses/8643364085&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Analysis from @monkchips on why Zimbra is more than just a mail server for VMW <a href="http://bit.ly/bw37Fe" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/bw37Fe</a> (See where we&#8217;re heading?)</p>
<p><i>This comment was originally posted on <a href="http://twitter.com/eXoPlatform/statuses/8643364085" rel="nofollow">Twitter</a></i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monkchips</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2010/02/04/vmware-zimbra-integration-without-context-shift/comment-page-1/#comment-549681</link>
		<dc:creator>monkchips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/?p=2511#comment-549681</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;VMware Zimbra: Integration without Context Shift &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/bw37Fe&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://bit.ly/bw37Fe&lt;/a&gt; some thoughts on why i think the deal could make a lot of sense&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;This comment was originally posted on &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/monkchips/statuses/8642280146&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VMware Zimbra: Integration without Context Shift <a href="http://bit.ly/bw37Fe" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/bw37Fe</a> some thoughts on why i think the deal could make a lot of sense</p>
<p><i>This comment was originally posted on <a href="http://twitter.com/monkchips/statuses/8642280146" rel="nofollow">Twitter</a></i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

