<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sustainability On Steroids: IBM, Nortel, SAS, SAP etc</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2008/05/01/sustainability-on-steroids-ibm-nortel-sas-sap-etc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2008/05/01/sustainability-on-steroids-ibm-nortel-sas-sap-etc/</link>
	<description>An industry analyst blog looking at software ecosystems and convergence</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 07:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2008/05/01/sustainability-on-steroids-ibm-nortel-sas-sap-etc/#comment-373449</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 09:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2008/05/01/sustainability-on-steroids-ibm-nortel-sas-sap-etc/#comment-373449</guid>
		<description>It's a pity you didn't spot it before now. I used to be a student in Cork (Tyndall), and I never knew about CIX.

Anyways despite what Cisco are saying about the power ratings being for idle switches, they really can't get away from the figures. Their idle draw in comparison with the Nortel switches indicate that their solution are less power scalable. Switches are not 100% or 0% (or rarely anyways), and so a solution with lower idle draw will ultimately have lower power consumption over the range of activity. It's simple logic and one that really can't be danced away from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a pity you didn&#8217;t spot it before now. I used to be a student in Cork (Tyndall), and I never knew about CIX.</p>
<p>Anyways despite what Cisco are saying about the power ratings being for idle switches, they really can&#8217;t get away from the figures. Their idle draw in comparison with the Nortel switches indicate that their solution are less power scalable. Switches are not 100% or 0% (or rarely anyways), and so a solution with lower idle draw will ultimately have lower power consumption over the range of activity. It&#8217;s simple logic and one that really can&#8217;t be danced away from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cisco Energy Tax &#171; Martin Kempell: Consumer Advocate and Technology Dude About Town</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2008/05/01/sustainability-on-steroids-ibm-nortel-sas-sap-etc/#comment-371695</link>
		<dc:creator>Cisco Energy Tax &#171; Martin Kempell: Consumer Advocate and Technology Dude About Town</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 04:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2008/05/01/sustainability-on-steroids-ibm-nortel-sas-sap-etc/#comment-371695</guid>
		<description>[...] 5/13: Check out what James has to say. He welcomes the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 5/13: Check out what James has to say. He welcomes the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nortel Buzzboard</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2008/05/01/sustainability-on-steroids-ibm-nortel-sas-sap-etc/#comment-367367</link>
		<dc:creator>Nortel Buzzboard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2008/05/01/sustainability-on-steroids-ibm-nortel-sas-sap-etc/#comment-367367</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Nortel energy calculator remorse...&lt;/strong&gt;

The word on Nortel&#8217;s energy efficiency advantages for enterprise networks is getting out there, but not soon enough for some.  On his Lower (Carbon) Footprint blog, Tom Raftery has this post about his Cisco buyer&#8217;s remorse.  Tom is a co-f...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Nortel energy calculator remorse&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The word on Nortel&#8217;s energy efficiency advantages for enterprise networks is getting out there, but not soon enough for some.  On his Lower (Carbon) Footprint blog, Tom Raftery has this post about his Cisco buyer&#8217;s remorse.  Tom is a co-f&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
