<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: links for 2007-11-08</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/11/08/links-for-2007-11-08/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/11/08/links-for-2007-11-08/</link>
	<description>An industry analyst blog looking at software ecosystems and convergence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:35:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jgovernor</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/11/08/links-for-2007-11-08/comment-page-1/#comment-208553</link>
		<dc:creator>jgovernor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/11/08/links-for-2007-11-08/#comment-208553</guid>
		<description>Good point Mike. But as I say Microsoft has spent a lot of time explaining how it now &quot;underpins&quot; LSE operations. If there is a failure then, of course it will come under close scrutiny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Mike. But as I say Microsoft has spent a lot of time explaining how it now &#8220;underpins&#8221; LSE operations. If there is a failure then, of course it will come under close scrutiny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/11/08/links-for-2007-11-08/comment-page-1/#comment-203689</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 19:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/11/08/links-for-2007-11-08/#comment-203689</guid>
		<description>This screw-up can&#039;t be blamed on Microsoft, HP, Cisco or anyone else.    It is up to the London Stock Exchange to acquire and maintain a platform that works.    Delivering the data that market participants need.  24/24h 365 days of the year.       Or else get out of the business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This screw-up can&#8217;t be blamed on Microsoft, HP, Cisco or anyone else.    It is up to the London Stock Exchange to acquire and maintain a platform that works.    Delivering the data that market participants need.  24/24h 365 days of the year.       Or else get out of the business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Twisleton</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/11/08/links-for-2007-11-08/comment-page-1/#comment-201516</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Twisleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 14:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/11/08/links-for-2007-11-08/#comment-201516</guid>
		<description>RE: The LSE data feed problem

I&#039;ve probably missed something, but that article doesn&#039;t specifically state that the inherent failure of a Microsoft application was the cause of the &quot;data dissemination&quot; problems.  Our simple Reuters data feed is complicated enough,involving various networking and server solutions.  

By the looks of things, the LSE is a huge reference site for Cisco, HP and Accenture probably others too: http://www.silicon.com/financialservices/0,3800010322,39160347,00.htm

&quot;The data delivery system is a culmination of efforts from the likes of HP (hardware), Cisco (networks), Microsoft (software) and Accenture (project management), which all worked with the exchange&#039;s IT team to build the system, Infolect.&quot;

Isn&#039;t it just as likely that there&#039;s been poor capacity or change management which has led to the jitters?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: The LSE data feed problem</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve probably missed something, but that article doesn&#8217;t specifically state that the inherent failure of a Microsoft application was the cause of the &#8220;data dissemination&#8221; problems.  Our simple Reuters data feed is complicated enough,involving various networking and server solutions.  </p>
<p>By the looks of things, the LSE is a huge reference site for Cisco, HP and Accenture probably others too: <a href="http://www.silicon.com/financialservices/0,3800010322,39160347,00.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.silicon.com/financialservices/0,3800010322,39160347,00.htm</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The data delivery system is a culmination of efforts from the likes of HP (hardware), Cisco (networks), Microsoft (software) and Accenture (project management), which all worked with the exchange&#8217;s IT team to build the system, Infolect.&#8221;</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it just as likely that there&#8217;s been poor capacity or change management which has led to the jitters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

