<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: links for 2007-10-24</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/10/24/links-for-2007-10-24/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/10/24/links-for-2007-10-24/</link>
	<description>An industry analyst blog looking at software ecosystems and convergence</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ric</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/10/24/links-for-2007-10-24/#comment-184340</link>
		<dc:creator>Ric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/10/24/links-for-2007-10-24/#comment-184340</guid>
		<description>You're already aware of my thought that BEA:Oracle will be bad for BEA - SAP:IBM would I think be bad for IBM ... at the moment they are deliberately NOT in applications, which gives them some independence when dealing with apps vendors. Would they get enough value out of SAP to compensate for lost business elsewhere?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re already aware of my thought that BEA:Oracle will be bad for BEA - SAP:IBM would I think be bad for IBM &#8230; at the moment they are deliberately NOT in applications, which gives them some independence when dealing with apps vendors. Would they get enough value out of SAP to compensate for lost business elsewhere?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
