<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You can keep your &#8220;business language&#8221;: that&#8217;s not meaningful conversation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/09/24/you-can-keep-your-business-language-thats-not-meaningful-conversation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/09/24/you-can-keep-your-business-language-thats-not-meaningful-conversation/</link>
	<description>An industry analyst blog looking at software ecosystems and convergence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:45:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Zbigniew Lukasiak</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/09/24/you-can-keep-your-business-language-thats-not-meaningful-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-169132</link>
		<dc:creator>Zbigniew Lukasiak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 14:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/09/24/you-can-keep-your-business-language-thats-not-meaningful-conversation/#comment-169132</guid>
		<description>Actually it is a paraphrase of that McLuhann quoute which goes the other way around: &quot;The medium is the message&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually it is a paraphrase of that McLuhann quoute which goes the other way around: &#8220;The medium is the message&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jgovernor</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/09/24/you-can-keep-your-business-language-thats-not-meaningful-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-165806</link>
		<dc:creator>jgovernor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 16:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/09/24/you-can-keep-your-business-language-thats-not-meaningful-conversation/#comment-165806</guid>
		<description>hey Zbigniew I believe that&#039;s a quote from Marshall McLuhan - a 60s thinker who came up with the concept of the &quot;global village&quot;. smart dude.

Gary - great points as ever. I think a number of different modes of discourse have value. but in general, for example, white papers are seldom as valuable as they should be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey Zbigniew I believe that&#8217;s a quote from Marshall McLuhan &#8211; a 60s thinker who came up with the concept of the &#8220;global village&#8221;. smart dude.</p>
<p>Gary &#8211; great points as ever. I think a number of different modes of discourse have value. but in general, for example, white papers are seldom as valuable as they should be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zbigniew Lukasiak</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/09/24/you-can-keep-your-business-language-thats-not-meaningful-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-165190</link>
		<dc:creator>Zbigniew Lukasiak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/09/24/you-can-keep-your-business-language-thats-not-meaningful-conversation/#comment-165190</guid>
		<description>&quot;Message is the medium&quot; - this is a quote I&#039;ve seen somewhere that sums the whole twitter thing in my opinion.
By exchanging the perhaps less obviously valuable information you keep the information channel open.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Message is the medium&#8221; &#8211; this is a quote I&#8217;ve seen somewhere that sums the whole twitter thing in my opinion.<br />
By exchanging the perhaps less obviously valuable information you keep the information channel open.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Barnett</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/09/24/you-can-keep-your-business-language-thats-not-meaningful-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-165041</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Barnett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 06:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/09/24/you-can-keep-your-business-language-thats-not-meaningful-conversation/#comment-165041</guid>
		<description>Surely it&#039;s a horses for courses thing?

I agree 100% that a lot of business dialogue is either trite and pointless or so narrowly focussed that it utterly misses the real point.

But there are all sorts of &quot;type&quot; of real conversation - Which is why there&#039;s just no answer to the question &quot;is there an &lt;b&gt;optimal&lt;/b&gt; mode of discourse&quot;.

You&#039;ve got a black-belt in &quot;Conversational Jazz&quot;, and god knows there have to be more bouncy, ad-libby, &quot;orgy of the synapses&quot;-type conversations in business... But if you&#039;re in a meeting about Audit, or your compliance with FCC regulations then you probably need to keep it dull - It would be hard to tell the SEC &quot;Well we had a meeting about audit... but then Jimbo saw a flower.....&quot;

So you have to place &quot;conversation&quot; within a spectrum... at one end there must be the dull &quot;exchange of facts&quot; style dialogue. It would be annoying if everytime I asked you the time you were to reply &quot;time for what? time for who?&quot;... I&#039;d like just to know how late I am for my meeting. 

At the other end of the spectrum... where you spend a lot of time living and working (and providing value I hasten to add) there&#039;s a richer more intimate dialogue where knowing how much you enjoyed your Eggs Benedict might trigger a new conversation with you that could lead almost anywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely it&#8217;s a horses for courses thing?</p>
<p>I agree 100% that a lot of business dialogue is either trite and pointless or so narrowly focussed that it utterly misses the real point.</p>
<p>But there are all sorts of &#8220;type&#8221; of real conversation &#8211; Which is why there&#8217;s just no answer to the question &#8220;is there an <b>optimal</b> mode of discourse&#8221;.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve got a black-belt in &#8220;Conversational Jazz&#8221;, and god knows there have to be more bouncy, ad-libby, &#8220;orgy of the synapses&#8221;-type conversations in business&#8230; But if you&#8217;re in a meeting about Audit, or your compliance with FCC regulations then you probably need to keep it dull &#8211; It would be hard to tell the SEC &#8220;Well we had a meeting about audit&#8230; but then Jimbo saw a flower&#8230;..&#8221;</p>
<p>So you have to place &#8220;conversation&#8221; within a spectrum&#8230; at one end there must be the dull &#8220;exchange of facts&#8221; style dialogue. It would be annoying if everytime I asked you the time you were to reply &#8220;time for what? time for who?&#8221;&#8230; I&#8217;d like just to know how late I am for my meeting. </p>
<p>At the other end of the spectrum&#8230; where you spend a lot of time living and working (and providing value I hasten to add) there&#8217;s a richer more intimate dialogue where knowing how much you enjoyed your Eggs Benedict might trigger a new conversation with you that could lead almost anywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: afongen &#187; I hardly ever use PGP anymore. This isn&#8217;t why, but&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/09/24/you-can-keep-your-business-language-thats-not-meaningful-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-164900</link>
		<dc:creator>afongen &#187; I hardly ever use PGP anymore. This isn&#8217;t why, but&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 02:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/09/24/you-can-keep-your-business-language-thats-not-meaningful-conversation/#comment-164900</guid>
		<description>[...] By the way, and perhaps speaking more to the intended point. If you followed the link, did you notice that post by James Governor? Go read it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] By the way, and perhaps speaking more to the intended point. If you followed the link, did you notice that post by James Governor? Go read it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Process Perfection</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/09/24/you-can-keep-your-business-language-thats-not-meaningful-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-164563</link>
		<dc:creator>Process Perfection</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/09/24/you-can-keep-your-business-language-thats-not-meaningful-conversation/#comment-164563</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Is there an &quot;optimal&quot; mode of discourse?...&lt;/strong&gt;

James Governor&#8217;s Monkchips -- You can keep your &#8220;business language&#8221;: that&#8217;s not meaningful conversation  
 Is there an &quot;optimal&quot; mode of discourse?  Leading question, I know.  Framed the way it is, the answer seems obvious: &quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Is there an &#8220;optimal&#8221; mode of discourse?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>James Governor&rsquo;s Monkchips &#8212; You can keep your &ldquo;business language&rdquo;: that&rsquo;s not meaningful conversation<br />
 Is there an &#8220;optimal&#8221; mode of discourse?  Leading question, I know.  Framed the way it is, the answer seems obvious: &#8220;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roo Reynolds - What&#8217;s Next? &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Links for Monday 24th September, 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/09/24/you-can-keep-your-business-language-thats-not-meaningful-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-163993</link>
		<dc:creator>Roo Reynolds - What&#8217;s Next? &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Links for Monday 24th September, 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 19:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/09/24/you-can-keep-your-business-language-thats-not-meaningful-conversation/#comment-163993</guid>
		<description>[...] James Governor - You can keep your &#226;business language&#226;: that&#8217;s not meaningful conv... - &#8220;I don&#8217;t only want to know What Stephen and Cote Are Working On. Rather I want to know How They Are Doing. Good managers take a view of their people that goes far beyond the tasks they assign. Twitter helps to keep us all in the loop.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] James Governor &#8211; You can keep your &acirc;business language&acirc;: that&#8217;s not meaningful conv&#8230; &#8211; &#8220;I don&#8217;t only want to know What Stephen and Cote Are Working On. Rather I want to know How They Are Doing. Good managers take a view of their people that goes far beyond the tasks they assign. Twitter helps to keep us all in the loop.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris dalby</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/09/24/you-can-keep-your-business-language-thats-not-meaningful-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-163410</link>
		<dc:creator>chris dalby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 23:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/09/24/you-can-keep-your-business-language-thats-not-meaningful-conversation/#comment-163410</guid>
		<description>I thought you thunk that twimping a twinped twimp is like throwing caution to the wind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought you thunk that twimping a twinped twimp is like throwing caution to the wind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rupert</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/09/24/you-can-keep-your-business-language-thats-not-meaningful-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-163218</link>
		<dc:creator>Rupert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/09/24/you-can-keep-your-business-language-thats-not-meaningful-conversation/#comment-163218</guid>
		<description>Great thoughts.
I&#039;ve never been in a place where I&#039;ve learnt so many things that I didn&#039;t know I wanted to learn - and needed to learn.  Of all the new things I learn every day, I reckon the majority of them come from links on Twitter.  And because they&#039;re not narrowly focussed on a topic, there&#039;s the chance for seredipitous and surprising connections to be made between what you&#039;re focusing on - things that inform from a wider human or technical perspective.
And when conversation is littered with intimate details of work and family life, there&#039;s less room for bullshitting, heirarchy and one-upmanship.  Not many people are out to puff up themselves or their their theories - they&#039;re just throwing up gems of interest for other people to read and briefly acknowledge.
It&#039;s holistic, and richer for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great thoughts.<br />
I&#8217;ve never been in a place where I&#8217;ve learnt so many things that I didn&#8217;t know I wanted to learn &#8211; and needed to learn.  Of all the new things I learn every day, I reckon the majority of them come from links on Twitter.  And because they&#8217;re not narrowly focussed on a topic, there&#8217;s the chance for seredipitous and surprising connections to be made between what you&#8217;re focusing on &#8211; things that inform from a wider human or technical perspective.<br />
And when conversation is littered with intimate details of work and family life, there&#8217;s less room for bullshitting, heirarchy and one-upmanship.  Not many people are out to puff up themselves or their their theories &#8211; they&#8217;re just throwing up gems of interest for other people to read and briefly acknowledge.<br />
It&#8217;s holistic, and richer for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
