<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Cult of The Professional/The Long Tail of Authority</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/07/03/the-cult-of-the-professionalthe-long-tail-of-authority/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/07/03/the-cult-of-the-professionalthe-long-tail-of-authority/</link>
	<description>An industry analyst blog looking at software ecosystems and convergence</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 01:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Infuse &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A long tail of authority?</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/07/03/the-cult-of-the-professionalthe-long-tail-of-authority/#comment-503315</link>
		<dc:creator>Infuse &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A long tail of authority?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 19:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/07/03/the-cult-of-the-professionalthe-long-tail-of-authority/#comment-503315</guid>
		<description>[...] James at Redmonk posts on Andrew Keen’s book The Cult of the Amateur. Keen’s point is, in a nutshell, that user-generated content is inferior to that of professionals. So we take risks by using social media sources as reference points – Wikipedia and its (allegedly) dodgy content is the oft-cited example. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] James at Redmonk posts on Andrew Keen’s book The Cult of the Amateur. Keen’s point is, in a nutshell, that user-generated content is inferior to that of professionals. So we take risks by using social media sources as reference points – Wikipedia and its (allegedly) dodgy content is the oft-cited example. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jgovernor</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/07/03/the-cult-of-the-professionalthe-long-tail-of-authority/#comment-118113</link>
		<dc:creator>jgovernor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 09:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/07/03/the-cult-of-the-professionalthe-long-tail-of-authority/#comment-118113</guid>
		<description>@jqp Its a good point. The Onion is a good source of news and information too. Certainly better than some of the crap that passes for authoritative in our culture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jqp Its a good point. The Onion is a good source of news and information too. Certainly better than some of the crap that passes for authoritative in our culture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jqp</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/07/03/the-cult-of-the-professionalthe-long-tail-of-authority/#comment-117475</link>
		<dc:creator>jqp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/07/03/the-cult-of-the-professionalthe-long-tail-of-authority/#comment-117475</guid>
		<description>James wrote "I think Chris Anderson gets it right though. Wikipedia is where you start your research, not where you finish it."

I neither start nor finish my research with Wikipedia. It's simply another resource I occasionally visit as a form of entertainment. While I would never argue that  my primary resources are 100% accurate and reliable, I have found Wikipedia to be unacceptably inaccurate and unreliable.

Carr wrote "They go to Wikipedia because it’s free and convenient. They know its quality and reliability are imperfect, but that’s a tradeoff they’re willing to make as they hurriedly fill their market baskets with information."

Perhaps they should bookmark The Onion as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James wrote &#8220;I think Chris Anderson gets it right though. Wikipedia is where you start your research, not where you finish it.&#8221;</p>
<p>I neither start nor finish my research with Wikipedia. It&#8217;s simply another resource I occasionally visit as a form of entertainment. While I would never argue that  my primary resources are 100% accurate and reliable, I have found Wikipedia to be unacceptably inaccurate and unreliable.</p>
<p>Carr wrote &#8220;They go to Wikipedia because it’s free and convenient. They know its quality and reliability are imperfect, but that’s a tradeoff they’re willing to make as they hurriedly fill their market baskets with information.&#8221;</p>
<p>Perhaps they should bookmark The Onion as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jgovernor</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/07/03/the-cult-of-the-professionalthe-long-tail-of-authority/#comment-115831</link>
		<dc:creator>jgovernor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/07/03/the-cult-of-the-professionalthe-long-tail-of-authority/#comment-115831</guid>
		<description>"Similarly, the profession may like you to believe that audit is unprofitable" - perhaps you could drill into that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Similarly, the profession may like you to believe that audit is unprofitable&#8221; - perhaps you could drill into that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tax Research UK / If you&#8217;re not independent you&#8217;re not a professional</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/07/03/the-cult-of-the-professionalthe-long-tail-of-authority/#comment-115464</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Research UK / If you&#8217;re not independent you&#8217;re not a professional</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 13:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/07/03/the-cult-of-the-professionalthe-long-tail-of-authority/#comment-115464</guid>
		<description>[...] Howlett has written a long and considered response on his blog to a claim made elsewhere that claimed: If the cult of the amateur is growing, it&#8217;s a direct response to the failures [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Howlett has written a long and considered response on his blog to a claim made elsewhere that claimed: If the cult of the amateur is growing, it&#8217;s a direct response to the failures [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/07/03/the-cult-of-the-professionalthe-long-tail-of-authority/#comment-115412</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 09:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/07/03/the-cult-of-the-professionalthe-long-tail-of-authority/#comment-115412</guid>
		<description>James - The big frauds occur where there is collusion and deliberate attempts to hide or disguise transactions. That has little to do with oversight. I suggest you've fallen for the perception that audit is designed to detect fraud. It is not and never has been. 

Similarly, the profession may like you to believe that audit is unprofitable but that's not true. No question that consulting is more profitable but that's a different issue. 

It's still possible to legitimately consult on issues that don't have an audit impact - eg business strategy, location, product mix, profit optimisation etc. I'd argue that tax is treading into dangerous territory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James - The big frauds occur where there is collusion and deliberate attempts to hide or disguise transactions. That has little to do with oversight. I suggest you&#8217;ve fallen for the perception that audit is designed to detect fraud. It is not and never has been. </p>
<p>Similarly, the profession may like you to believe that audit is unprofitable but that&#8217;s not true. No question that consulting is more profitable but that&#8217;s a different issue. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s still possible to legitimately consult on issues that don&#8217;t have an audit impact - eg business strategy, location, product mix, profit optimisation etc. I&#8217;d argue that tax is treading into dangerous territory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jgovernor</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/07/03/the-cult-of-the-professionalthe-long-tail-of-authority/#comment-115394</link>
		<dc:creator>jgovernor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 07:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/07/03/the-cult-of-the-professionalthe-long-tail-of-authority/#comment-115394</guid>
		<description>Good to see you Dennis. Good point on cause and effect. I would argue light touch has some issues. If company executives know the quality of the oversight is low, they are more likely to cook the books. that seems like classic cause and effect to me. your industry quite recently made the case that it needed to carry out both audit and consultancy, in order to make a profit, because audit wasn't profitable enough. 

vinnie regarding the reality check, all i said was there some vacuums to fill. Professions are here for the long haul, just as broadcast TV is, but that doesn't mean the businesses won't change. You also really need to expand your world view to include influencers are well as buyers, to be more complete in your analysis.

Charles- amen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see you Dennis. Good point on cause and effect. I would argue light touch has some issues. If company executives know the quality of the oversight is low, they are more likely to cook the books. that seems like classic cause and effect to me. your industry quite recently made the case that it needed to carry out both audit and consultancy, in order to make a profit, because audit wasn&#8217;t profitable enough. </p>
<p>vinnie regarding the reality check, all i said was there some vacuums to fill. Professions are here for the long haul, just as broadcast TV is, but that doesn&#8217;t mean the businesses won&#8217;t change. You also really need to expand your world view to include influencers are well as buyers, to be more complete in your analysis.</p>
<p>Charles- amen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Edward Frith</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/07/03/the-cult-of-the-professionalthe-long-tail-of-authority/#comment-115273</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Edward Frith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 21:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/07/03/the-cult-of-the-professionalthe-long-tail-of-authority/#comment-115273</guid>
		<description>I'm convinced that the cult of the professional will be the considered view in the future. If this mismanaged world is the result of professionals there's a lot of room for improvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m convinced that the cult of the professional will be the considered view in the future. If this mismanaged world is the result of professionals there&#8217;s a lot of room for improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinnie mirchandani</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/07/03/the-cult-of-the-professionalthe-long-tail-of-authority/#comment-114138</link>
		<dc:creator>vinnie mirchandani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 11:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/07/03/the-cult-of-the-professionalthe-long-tail-of-authority/#comment-114138</guid>
		<description>James, with due respect...all of us bloggers need to periodically perform reality checks. If more than 5% of our readers are execs with budget authorities over IT, audit, advertising etc dollars - "professional" spend, I would start to agree with you.  They may be wary of the professionals, but don't misread that as they have moved to the crowds...they are learning to better monitor the professionals. And professionals did not become professionals overnight - they have relationships, duarability and surely at least some credentials. They did not become established pros without ability to morph with the times...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, with due respect&#8230;all of us bloggers need to periodically perform reality checks. If more than 5% of our readers are execs with budget authorities over IT, audit, advertising etc dollars - &#8220;professional&#8221; spend, I would start to agree with you.  They may be wary of the professionals, but don&#8217;t misread that as they have moved to the crowds&#8230;they are learning to better monitor the professionals. And professionals did not become professionals overnight - they have relationships, duarability and surely at least some credentials. They did not become established pros without ability to morph with the times&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are the days of the professional numbered? &#171; AccMan</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/07/03/the-cult-of-the-professionalthe-long-tail-of-authority/#comment-113931</link>
		<dc:creator>Are the days of the professional numbered? &#171; AccMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 05:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/07/03/the-cult-of-the-professionalthe-long-tail-of-authority/#comment-113931</guid>
		<description>[...] I first read James Governor&#8217;s post entitled The Cult of The Professional/The Long Tail of Authority I was aghast. Who could possibly assert: As budgets are repeatedly slashed (we can’t afford to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I first read James Governor&#8217;s post entitled The Cult of The Professional/The Long Tail of Authority I was aghast. Who could possibly assert: As budgets are repeatedly slashed (we can’t afford to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
