<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: links for 2007-04-25</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/04/25/links-for-2007-04-25/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/04/25/links-for-2007-04-25/</link>
	<description>An industry analyst blog looking at software ecosystems and convergence</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Simon Phipps</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/04/25/links-for-2007-04-25/#comment-69022</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Phipps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/04/25/links-for-2007-04-25/#comment-69022</guid>
		<description>It's only time to stop calling it a "JVM" if you think the "J" only stood for a programming language. I've regarded the J word as the name for a VM platform ever since I first saw it in 1995 (at IBM) and I am thrilled we're finally removing the "programming language" blinkers to see the value of the platform.

More specifically, all the time it's a virtual machine for executing Java Bytecode it will be a JVM, IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s only time to stop calling it a &#8220;JVM&#8221; if you think the &#8220;J&#8221; only stood for a programming language. I&#8217;ve regarded the J word as the name for a VM platform ever since I first saw it in 1995 (at IBM) and I am thrilled we&#8217;re finally removing the &#8220;programming language&#8221; blinkers to see the value of the platform.</p>
<p>More specifically, all the time it&#8217;s a virtual machine for executing Java Bytecode it will be a JVM, IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
