<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why IBM Should Acquire Amazon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/04/19/why-ibm-should-acquire-amazon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/04/19/why-ibm-should-acquire-amazon/</link>
	<description>An industry analyst blog looking at software ecosystems and convergence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:35:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tecosystems &#187; When Your Customer is Your Competitor: The Return of Roll Your Own</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/04/19/why-ibm-should-acquire-amazon/comment-page-1/#comment-548547</link>
		<dc:creator>tecosystems &#187; When Your Customer is Your Competitor: The Return of Roll Your Own</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 22:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/04/19/why-ibm-should-acquire-amazon/#comment-548547</guid>
		<description>[...] James and I tend to agree: Amazon is, in fact, a technology vendor. Even if you don&#8217;t subscribe to that idea, you should be planning as if they are. Because the evidence is mounting that the software vendors are facing a powerful new market competitor: their customers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] James and I tend to agree: Amazon is, in fact, a technology vendor. Even if you don&#8217;t subscribe to that idea, you should be planning as if they are. Because the evidence is mounting that the software vendors are facing a powerful new market competitor: their customers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanielFeygin's Bookmarks on Delicious</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/04/19/why-ibm-should-acquire-amazon/comment-page-1/#comment-521465</link>
		<dc:creator>DanielFeygin's Bookmarks on Delicious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/04/19/why-ibm-should-acquire-amazon/#comment-521465</guid>
		<description>[...] James Governor’s Monkchips » Why IBM Should Acquire Amazon SAVE [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] James Governor’s Monkchips » Why IBM Should Acquire Amazon SAVE [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Governor&#8217;s Monkchips &#187; &#8220;It would be hard to convince me Amazon needs IBM&#8221;. Bonus Erlang dorkery</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/04/19/why-ibm-should-acquire-amazon/comment-page-1/#comment-242214</link>
		<dc:creator>James Governor&#8217;s Monkchips &#187; &#8220;It would be hard to convince me Amazon needs IBM&#8221;. Bonus Erlang dorkery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/04/19/why-ibm-should-acquire-amazon/#comment-242214</guid>
		<description>[...] matters is the money you make for other people. Amazon really seems to understand that. If IBM had bought Amazon at its share price at the time of my recommendation, it would be looking golden by close of play [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] matters is the money you make for other people. Amazon really seems to understand that. If IBM had bought Amazon at its share price at the time of my recommendation, it would be looking golden by close of play [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the capacity : You pick, open infrastructure or getting things done?</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/04/19/why-ibm-should-acquire-amazon/comment-page-1/#comment-240603</link>
		<dc:creator>the capacity : You pick, open infrastructure or getting things done?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 03:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/04/19/why-ibm-should-acquire-amazon/#comment-240603</guid>
		<description>[...] First it was their marketplace, which is to ebay what Facebook is to MySpace. However, they&#8217;ve since moved beyond alternate definitions of &#8216;retailer&#8217;. Now, in the techno-sphere, Amazon&#8217;s best known for their WebServices which have been used building all kinds of interesting businesses. They&#8217;ve grown so influential in the Web2.0 world, that James Governor at RedMonk suggests IBM should consider purchasing Amazon! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] First it was their marketplace, which is to ebay what Facebook is to MySpace. However, they&#8217;ve since moved beyond alternate definitions of &#8216;retailer&#8217;. Now, in the techno-sphere, Amazon&#8217;s best known for their WebServices which have been used building all kinds of interesting businesses. They&#8217;ve grown so influential in the Web2.0 world, that James Governor at RedMonk suggests IBM should consider purchasing Amazon! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tecosystems &#187; Beyond the Books: Amazon&#8217;s Next Generation Application Platform</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/04/19/why-ibm-should-acquire-amazon/comment-page-1/#comment-132058</link>
		<dc:creator>tecosystems &#187; Beyond the Books: Amazon&#8217;s Next Generation Application Platform</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 04:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/04/19/why-ibm-should-acquire-amazon/#comment-132058</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Right now IBM is very well set up for selling to Enterprise 1.0. But selling to Enterprise 2.0 is going to mean selling to the active end-points, or at least having a conversation with them. IBM needs a ubiquity play. It needs an storage cloud play. With Amazon on board it would have these things. IBM would be part of the internet backbone, and that’s where it has to be.&#8221; - James Governor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Right now IBM is very well set up for selling to Enterprise 1.0. But selling to Enterprise 2.0 is going to mean selling to the active end-points, or at least having a conversation with them. IBM needs a ubiquity play. It needs an storage cloud play. With Amazon on board it would have these things. IBM would be part of the internet backbone, and that’s where it has to be.&#8221; &#8211; James Governor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Governor&#8217;s Monkchips &#187; Cisco as a &#34;consumer&#34; company</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/04/19/why-ibm-should-acquire-amazon/comment-page-1/#comment-106835</link>
		<dc:creator>James Governor&#8217;s Monkchips &#187; Cisco as a &#34;consumer&#34; company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 11:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/04/19/why-ibm-should-acquire-amazon/#comment-106835</guid>
		<description>[...] rather than fostering community-created content, its missing a huge part of the future. IBM makes the same mistake. Its about the shackles of success. Technology companies have no choice but to compete with media [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rather than fostering community-created content, its missing a huge part of the future. IBM makes the same mistake. Its about the shackles of success. Technology companies have no choice but to compete with media [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; IBM and Amazon&#8211;no way &#124; Between the Lines &#124; ZDNet.com</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/04/19/why-ibm-should-acquire-amazon/comment-page-1/#comment-87379</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; IBM and Amazon&#8211;no way &#124; Between the Lines &#124; ZDNet.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 12:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/04/19/why-ibm-should-acquire-amazon/#comment-87379</guid>
		<description>[...] James Governor argues that IBM is too risk averse, large-enterprise focused, and lacks a strong presence at the core of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] James Governor argues that IBM is too risk averse, large-enterprise focused, and lacks a strong presence at the core of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Ward-Dutton</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/04/19/why-ibm-should-acquire-amazon/comment-page-1/#comment-87314</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Ward-Dutton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 10:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/04/19/why-ibm-should-acquire-amazon/#comment-87314</guid>
		<description>Perhaps it&#039;s a case of &quot;better late than never&quot; here James - sorry for not weighing in earlier. As you can see &lt;a href=&#039;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/04/20/amazon_marks_sparks/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; Amazon&#039;s value isn&#039;t just in having a funky proposition for SMBs and Web 2.0 players. Amazon is providing the e-commerce infrastructure for UK retail success story Marks &amp; Spencer. 

What&#039;s interesting to me is that when you look at Amazon from the perspective of its component capabilities (CBM, anyone?) rather than from the perspective of its brand, this is a really interesting idea.

I know you&#039;re not the biggest CBM fan, James, but I think you&#039;re using it yourself without knowing ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s a case of &#8220;better late than never&#8221; here James &#8211; sorry for not weighing in earlier. As you can see <a href='http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/04/20/amazon_marks_sparks/' rel="nofollow">here</a> Amazon&#8217;s value isn&#8217;t just in having a funky proposition for SMBs and Web 2.0 players. Amazon is providing the e-commerce infrastructure for UK retail success story Marks &amp; Spencer. </p>
<p>What&#8217;s interesting to me is that when you look at Amazon from the perspective of its component capabilities (CBM, anyone?) rather than from the perspective of its brand, this is a really interesting idea.</p>
<p>I know you&#8217;re not the biggest CBM fan, James, but I think you&#8217;re using it yourself without knowing <img src='http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Governor&#8217;s Monkchips &#187; And then IBM</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/04/19/why-ibm-should-acquire-amazon/comment-page-1/#comment-82494</link>
		<dc:creator>James Governor&#8217;s Monkchips &#187; And then IBM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 19:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/04/19/why-ibm-should-acquire-amazon/#comment-82494</guid>
		<description>[...] be in the music download business when it buys Amazon, which is I guess why the idea will never happen. On reflection eMusic and Last.FM would probably cost upwards of $2bn so I don&#8217;t think Jeff [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be in the music download business when it buys Amazon, which is I guess why the idea will never happen. On reflection eMusic and Last.FM would probably cost upwards of $2bn so I don&#8217;t think Jeff [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Governor&#8217;s Monkchips &#187; Tivoli and Lotus acquisitions weren&#8217;t failures. More thoughts on why IBM should buy Amazon</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/04/19/why-ibm-should-acquire-amazon/comment-page-1/#comment-67935</link>
		<dc:creator>James Governor&#8217;s Monkchips &#187; Tivoli and Lotus acquisitions weren&#8217;t failures. More thoughts on why IBM should buy Amazon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/04/19/why-ibm-should-acquire-amazon/#comment-67935</guid>
		<description>[...] was reading this post from IBM Eye (thanks very much for the props Greg) which took my IBM should buy Amazon post seriously (it was meant [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was reading this post from IBM Eye (thanks very much for the props Greg) which took my IBM should buy Amazon post seriously (it was meant [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

