<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IBM Software Group contribution good, no Long Tail?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/03/12/ibm-software-group-contribution-good-no-long-tail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/03/12/ibm-software-group-contribution-good-no-long-tail/</link>
	<description>An industry analyst blog looking at software ecosystems and convergence</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 20:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-03-13 &#187; SDLC Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/03/12/ibm-software-group-contribution-good-no-long-tail/#comment-36571</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2007-03-13 &#187; SDLC Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 00:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/03/12/ibm-software-group-contribution-good-no-long-tail/#comment-36571</guid>
		<description>[...] James Governor’s Monkchips » IBM Software Group contribution good, no Long Tail? Its time for IBM to take off the shackles, if not the gloves. The business model is working well for the Fortune 500, but to achieve a real breakout some new thinking will be required and far more appetite for risk. (tags: IBM innovation research) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] James Governor’s Monkchips » IBM Software Group contribution good, no Long Tail? Its time for IBM to take off the shackles, if not the gloves. The business model is working well for the Fortune 500, but to achieve a real breakout some new thinking will be required and far more appetite for risk. (tags: IBM innovation research) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
