<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dork post: RFC vs XML Web Services performance test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/01/10/dork-post-rfc-vs-xml-web-services-performance-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/01/10/dork-post-rfc-vs-xml-web-services-performance-test/</link>
	<description>An industry analyst blog looking at software ecosystems and convergence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:35:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark O'Neill</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/01/10/dork-post-rfc-vs-xml-web-services-performance-test/comment-page-1/#comment-12454</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark O'Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/01/10/dork-post-rfc-vs-xml-web-services-performance-test/#comment-12454</guid>
		<description>Rich hits the nail on the head here. For example, if you use a profiler to see where the bottlenecks are in Java processing of XML documents, you find that it&#039;s not at the actual parsing level, but at the object-creation level [and anything else concerning objects - marshalling, mapping]. People say it&#039;s a problem of XML being &quot;text-based&quot;, but XML itself isn&#039;t so much to blame here, but rather the blame may go back to the original assumptions of how XML should be mapped to objects. I was programming with ASN.1 parsers and EDI parsers 10 years ago and that kind of object-creation overload would have been unconscionable then. 

I&#039;d love to write more, but I&#039;m afraid I&#039;d be lynched by my colleagues for giving away too much XML acceleration &quot;secret sauce&quot; in a public forum :-). But, we do have a case study of how we deployed appliances to offload processing from a SAP XI environment here: http://www.vordel.com/customers/manufacturing.html . I&#039;m happy to provide more technical details via email at http://radio.xmlstoragesystem.com/rcsPublic/mailto?usernum=0111797</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich hits the nail on the head here. For example, if you use a profiler to see where the bottlenecks are in Java processing of XML documents, you find that it&#8217;s not at the actual parsing level, but at the object-creation level [and anything else concerning objects - marshalling, mapping]. People say it&#8217;s a problem of XML being &#8220;text-based&#8221;, but XML itself isn&#8217;t so much to blame here, but rather the blame may go back to the original assumptions of how XML should be mapped to objects. I was programming with ASN.1 parsers and EDI parsers 10 years ago and that kind of object-creation overload would have been unconscionable then. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to write more, but I&#8217;m afraid I&#8217;d be lynched by my colleagues for giving away too much XML acceleration &#8220;secret sauce&#8221; in a public forum <img src='http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> . But, we do have a case study of how we deployed appliances to offload processing from a SAP XI environment here: <a href="http://www.vordel.com/customers/manufacturing.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.vordel.com/customers/manufacturing.html</a> . I&#8217;m happy to provide more technical details via email at <a href="http://radio.xmlstoragesystem.com/rcsPublic/mailto?usernum=0111797" rel="nofollow">http://radio.xmlstoragesystem.com/rcsPublic/mailto?usernum=0111797</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Salz</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/01/10/dork-post-rfc-vs-xml-web-services-performance-test/comment-page-1/#comment-11514</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Salz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/01/10/dork-post-rfc-vs-xml-web-services-performance-test/#comment-11514</guid>
		<description>What would you like to hear? :)  Our experiences agree with the comments by you and Daniel. I believe that one factor for this is the relative maturity of the TCP/HTTP/SSL stacks compared to the XML parsers; another is probably trying to do XML/object mapping &quot;gorp&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would you like to hear? <img src='http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   Our experiences agree with the comments by you and Daniel. I believe that one factor for this is the relative maturity of the TCP/HTTP/SSL stacks compared to the XML parsers; another is probably trying to do XML/object mapping &#8220;gorp&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary E Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/01/10/dork-post-rfc-vs-xml-web-services-performance-test/comment-page-1/#comment-9669</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary E Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/01/10/dork-post-rfc-vs-xml-web-services-performance-test/#comment-9669</guid>
		<description>Does Size Matter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Size Matter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan mcweeney</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/01/10/dork-post-rfc-vs-xml-web-services-performance-test/comment-page-1/#comment-9549</link>
		<dc:creator>dan mcweeney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2007/01/10/dork-post-rfc-vs-xml-web-services-performance-test/#comment-9549</guid>
		<description>I actually tried to put it on swivel, but there were lots of data sets and it seems that it only supports one data column at a time which is a bit of a nightmare.  If people want though i will throw it up there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually tried to put it on swivel, but there were lots of data sets and it seems that it only supports one data column at a time which is a bit of a nightmare.  If people want though i will throw it up there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

