<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Delivering the Synchronised Enterprise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2006/11/29/delivering-the-synchronised-enterprise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2006/11/29/delivering-the-synchronised-enterprise/</link>
	<description>An industry analyst blog looking at software ecosystems and convergence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:35:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2006/11/29/delivering-the-synchronised-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-2052</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 15:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/wp/?p=801#comment-2052</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d expect synchronisation to just &#039;be there,&#039; Mac like. 

On the SOX side, you&#039;re really documenting and testing the effectiveness of processes. In a finance setting, the ral work is in eliminating manual reconciliations etc. There are tools out there that will allow you to do that but at present they&#039;re very much on premise style offerings. For the cmpanies at which they&#039;re aimed, that makes perfect sense. At the moment. 

In SOX there&#039;s no concept of encapsulated process+data but there&#039;s no reason why SOX should not be used as a proxy for understanding the place of MDM in hybrid environments. E.g. where you&#039;re taking data feeds from online trading systems into say GL.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d expect synchronisation to just &#8216;be there,&#8217; Mac like. </p>
<p>On the SOX side, you&#8217;re really documenting and testing the effectiveness of processes. In a finance setting, the ral work is in eliminating manual reconciliations etc. There are tools out there that will allow you to do that but at present they&#8217;re very much on premise style offerings. For the cmpanies at which they&#8217;re aimed, that makes perfect sense. At the moment. </p>
<p>In SOX there&#8217;s no concept of encapsulated process+data but there&#8217;s no reason why SOX should not be used as a proxy for understanding the place of MDM in hybrid environments. E.g. where you&#8217;re taking data feeds from online trading systems into say GL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Ward-Dutton</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2006/11/29/delivering-the-synchronised-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-2051</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Ward-Dutton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 04:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/wp/?p=801#comment-2051</guid>
		<description>Sounds like Master Data Management?
Or am I trivialising what you&#039;re getting at...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like Master Data Management?<br />
Or am I trivialising what you&#8217;re getting at&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

