<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Innovation Magic: British Telecom to benefit, IBM loses a good one</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2006/09/27/on-innovation-magic-british-telecom-to-benefit-ibm-loses-a-good-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2006/09/27/on-innovation-magic-british-telecom-to-benefit-ibm-loses-a-good-one/</link>
	<description>An industry analyst blog looking at software ecosystems and convergence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:35:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pravin Adik</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2006/09/27/on-innovation-magic-british-telecom-to-benefit-ibm-loses-a-good-one/comment-page-1/#comment-107575</link>
		<dc:creator>Pravin Adik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 16:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/wp/?p=734#comment-107575</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I am a trying to understand the worldwide telecom market and I am coming across the terms &quot;operators&quot; and &quot;carriers&quot; very fequently. Though, I think these terms can be used interchangeably, I would like to know if there is any differece in these terms. Any help in this regard would really help resolving this confusion.

Thanks,
Pravin Adik</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I am a trying to understand the worldwide telecom market and I am coming across the terms &#8220;operators&#8221; and &#8220;carriers&#8221; very fequently. Though, I think these terms can be used interchangeably, I would like to know if there is any differece in these terms. Any help in this regard would really help resolving this confusion.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Pravin Adik</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James  Governor</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2006/09/27/on-innovation-magic-british-telecom-to-benefit-ibm-loses-a-good-one/comment-page-1/#comment-1917</link>
		<dc:creator>James  Governor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/wp/?p=734#comment-1917</guid>
		<description>nice. hello reader thanks for that. i call it like i see it - and to be fair i should perhaps have made a disclaimer to say Catherine has said nice things about me in the past. sorry about that. i also on reflection didn&#039;t put enough context in the argument. she did reinvent the role, but it couldn&#039;t have happened without a context - and the context was IBM realising the comms channels had significant value.

On Sun I say the team is excellent because it is.

AR managers magic quadrant- no. but i am thinking of running a best AR blog of the year competition....  
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice. hello reader thanks for that. i call it like i see it &#8211; and to be fair i should perhaps have made a disclaimer to say Catherine has said nice things about me in the past. sorry about that. i also on reflection didn&#8217;t put enough context in the argument. she did reinvent the role, but it couldn&#8217;t have happened without a context &#8211; and the context was IBM realising the comms channels had significant value.</p>
<p>On Sun I say the team is excellent because it is.</p>
<p>AR managers magic quadrant- no. but i am thinking of running a best AR blog of the year competition&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Reader</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2006/09/27/on-innovation-magic-british-telecom-to-benefit-ibm-loses-a-good-one/comment-page-1/#comment-1916</link>
		<dc:creator>A Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/wp/?p=734#comment-1916</guid>
		<description>Ah yes, mutual admiration is a much-splendored thing; too bad it&#039;s not based on more than brazen puffery.  You are pathetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes, mutual admiration is a much-splendored thing; too bad it&#8217;s not based on more than brazen puffery.  You are pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ARonaut</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2006/09/27/on-innovation-magic-british-telecom-to-benefit-ibm-loses-a-good-one/comment-page-1/#comment-1915</link>
		<dc:creator>ARonaut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 05:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/wp/?p=734#comment-1915</guid>
		<description>Have you ever thought about posting an AR Managers Magic Quadrant?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever thought about posting an AR Managers Magic Quadrant?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

