<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: REST meets ODF and ATOM: future flows, URIs and documents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2006/06/21/rest-meets-odf-and-atom-future-flows-uris-and-documents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2006/06/21/rest-meets-odf-and-atom-future-flows-uris-and-documents/</link>
	<description>An industry analyst blog looking at software ecosystems and convergence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:35:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2006/06/21/rest-meets-odf-and-atom-future-flows-uris-and-documents/comment-page-1/#comment-1640</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 21:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/wp/?p=639#comment-1640</guid>
		<description>What can I say - I think you&#039;re right on the money!   Business modelling looks at the world as known, stable processes - as opposed to mash-ups where content from dynamic sources with human insights for business solutions.   It&#039;s not an either/or situation - but I think mashups will actually give IT modellers a common dialog to discuss what should/could be implemented. 

I also think you&#039;re spot on that we&#039;ll see lots of different mash ups makers in the next 12-18 months - addressing a spectrum of business type activities.  We&#039;ve been amazed in the POCs with customers - start with one mash up scenario &amp; end up with a dozen building on the first.   So I do think there&#039;s a huge number of applications that have been unaffordable to build/wire - till now. 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What can I say &#8211; I think you&#8217;re right on the money!   Business modelling looks at the world as known, stable processes &#8211; as opposed to mash-ups where content from dynamic sources with human insights for business solutions.   It&#8217;s not an either/or situation &#8211; but I think mashups will actually give IT modellers a common dialog to discuss what should/could be implemented. </p>
<p>I also think you&#8217;re spot on that we&#8217;ll see lots of different mash ups makers in the next 12-18 months &#8211; addressing a spectrum of business type activities.  We&#8217;ve been amazed in the POCs with customers &#8211; start with one mash up scenario &amp; end up with a dozen building on the first.   So I do think there&#8217;s a huge number of applications that have been unaffordable to build/wire &#8211; till now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Bray</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2006/06/21/rest-meets-odf-and-atom-future-flows-uris-and-documents/comment-page-1/#comment-1639</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Bray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 21:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/wp/?p=639#comment-1639</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a grizzled veteran, and keenly aware of the immense, yawning gulf between a shiny new W3C spec and actually having interoperable implementations on peoples&#039; desktops.  They key question is not so 
much whether this is a good idea, as whether those who control the browser ecosystem will be motivated to implement it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a grizzled veteran, and keenly aware of the immense, yawning gulf between a shiny new W3C spec and actually having interoperable implementations on peoples&#8217; desktops.  They key question is not so<br />
much whether this is a good idea, as whether those who control the browser ecosystem will be motivated to implement it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james governor</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2006/06/21/rest-meets-odf-and-atom-future-flows-uris-and-documents/comment-page-1/#comment-1638</link>
		<dc:creator>james governor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 21:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/wp/?p=639#comment-1638</guid>
		<description>Yes, Ric, Kurt is truly awesome. i have been tracking his xforms primers. learning a lot in the process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Ric, Kurt is truly awesome. i have been tracking his xforms primers. learning a lot in the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ric</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2006/06/21/rest-meets-odf-and-atom-future-flows-uris-and-documents/comment-page-1/#comment-1637</link>
		<dc:creator>Ric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 21:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/wp/?p=639#comment-1637</guid>
		<description>One guy you should keep an eye on for more on all things XML is Kurt Cagle, who blogs over at O&#039;Reilly&#039;s XML blog - one smart dude who knows way more about XML in general and XForms in particular than is good for him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One guy you should keep an eye on for more on all things XML is Kurt Cagle, who blogs over at O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s XML blog &#8211; one smart dude who knows way more about XML in general and XForms in particular than is good for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

