<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Definitive Proof that Ruby on Rails is enterprise technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2006/04/10/the-definitive-proof-that-ruby-on-rails-is-enterprise-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2006/04/10/the-definitive-proof-that-ruby-on-rails-is-enterprise-technology/</link>
	<description>An industry analyst blog looking at software ecosystems and convergence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:35:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaime Cardoso</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2006/04/10/the-definitive-proof-that-ruby-on-rails-is-enterprise-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1466</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaime Cardoso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 23:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/wp/?p=576#comment-1466</guid>
		<description>So, you&#039;re saying that &quot;beeing enterprise&quot; = &quot;being fashionable&quot;?
Don&#039;t get me wrong, this sure is a great step for Ruby&#039;s popularity but, IBM&#039;s endorsement just proves it&#039;s popular, not that it&#039;s good.
One thing that IBM can do for Ruby is to put all that experience in documenting and profilling applications to help the entire stack of people to deliver more value using this technology. That would be the kind of commitment from IBM that would lead me to agree with you, until then, it&#039;s just taking advantage of a Fashion.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, you&#8217;re saying that &#8220;beeing enterprise&#8221; = &#8220;being fashionable&#8221;?<br />
Don&#8217;t get me wrong, this sure is a great step for Ruby&#8217;s popularity but, IBM&#8217;s endorsement just proves it&#8217;s popular, not that it&#8217;s good.<br />
One thing that IBM can do for Ruby is to put all that experience in documenting and profilling applications to help the entire stack of people to deliver more value using this technology. That would be the kind of commitment from IBM that would lead me to agree with you, until then, it&#8217;s just taking advantage of a Fashion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

