I may have initially missed the point of the internet, but no one could have imagined what would happen after the big bang in 1992 – that a fundamental paradox would develop between the ever-expanding diversity of sites devoted to information and the rapid concentration of sites selling goods.Those of you familiar with current explanations for the formation of planets in our solar system will realise that the commercial side of the internet exactly mimics the accretion theory, which holds that the planets were formed by the gradual accumulation of material. As these bodies got larger, their gravitational fields pulled in more and more of the icy minnows swarming in the void.
Amazon, Yahoo, Google, eBay and craigslist are those planetary monsters. They formed in what will be seen in the future as the first few seconds after the big bang. They expanded and their influence already extends to neighbouring systems.
Recent Posts
- Our first major European conference is taking shape nicely.
- Internet of ThingWorx, bringing industrial into the mix
- What we have here is a business model
- SAP and SuccessFactors- buying the past or the future, the corporation or the human?
- On The Genesis, Present and Future of Monki Gras – technical and social bridgebuilding

That is a great analogy, and it then raises the question: “Where does “Web 2.0” fit in?
–A passing comet, bright but vaporous
–Solar wind
–Alpha release of the next Big Bang
Nice shout out for Gustav Holst, too. I’m not sure what the anthem for the Internet would be, but “The Planets” is a contender, at least as an opening score.