<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Numbers, Volume 10</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2009/04/23/numbers-volume-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2009/04/23/numbers-volume-10/</link>
	<description>One foot in the muck, the other in utopia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 14:45:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RIA Weekly &#187; RIA Weekly #49 - RIA Data-pipes, Selling RIAs</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2009/04/23/numbers-volume-10/comment-page-1/#comment-317042</link>
		<dc:creator>RIA Weekly &#187; RIA Weekly #49 - RIA Data-pipes, Selling RIAs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2009/04/23/numbers-volume-10/#comment-317042</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Strobe&#8221; project. If you&#8217;re interested, I gave a small amount of commentary in this week&#8217;s Numbers post. Ryan has a small write-up as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Strobe&#8221; project. If you&#8217;re interested, I gave a small amount of commentary in this week&#8217;s Numbers post. Ryan has a small write-up as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tarus</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2009/04/23/numbers-volume-10/comment-page-1/#comment-316571</link>
		<dc:creator>Tarus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2009/04/23/numbers-volume-10/#comment-316571</guid>
		<description>To put IBM&#039;s profits in an even better perspective, check out Apple (AAPL): 
 
&quot;Over the past three months, Apple enjoyed its best-ever non-holiday quarter. $8.16 billion in revenue, up 9 percent from last year. Profits of $1.2 billion, up 20 percent from a year ago. Apple beat consensus estimates by about 24 cents per share&quot; 
 
As of today, AAPL has a market cap of $111B compared to IBM&#039;s $136B - roughly the same, yet IBM has almost twice as much profit. Most people think that Apple is highly profitable, but put into this context ... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To put IBM&#039;s profits in an even better perspective, check out Apple (AAPL):</p>
<p>&quot;Over the past three months, Apple enjoyed its best-ever non-holiday quarter. $8.16 billion in revenue, up 9 percent from last year. Profits of $1.2 billion, up 20 percent from a year ago. Apple beat consensus estimates by about 24 cents per share&quot;</p>
<p>As of today, AAPL has a market cap of $111B compared to IBM&#039;s $136B &#8211; roughly the same, yet IBM has almost twice as much profit. Most people think that Apple is highly profitable, but put into this context &#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

