http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2009/01/21/ls09/ One foot in the muck, the other in utopia Thu, 24 May 2012 14:45:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2009/01/21/ls09/comment-page-1/#comment-293090 People Over Process » Pulse 2009 - WOO’ing the Cloud - IT Management Podcast Special Tue, 10 Feb 2009 03:24:22 +0000 http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2009/01/21/ls09/#comment-293090 [...] Finally, we wrap-up discussing the Tivoli cloud computing story we’ve been seeing evolve here at Pulse. James is (still) not too happy with the IBM cloud story. That said, he suggests pulling in the OnDemand phrase and discussion from the past, the content of which he liked. I add in that the cloud computing discussion seems to be around what cloud means for operations people, not end-users, where you’d expect to hear more from the Lotus folks (as we did back at Lotusphere this year). [...] [...] Finally, we wrap-up discussing the Tivoli cloud computing story we’ve been seeing evolve here at Pulse. James is (still) not too happy with the IBM cloud story. That said, he suggests pulling in the OnDemand phrase and discussion from the past, the content of which he liked. I add in that the cloud computing discussion seems to be around what cloud means for operations people, not end-users, where you’d expect to hear more from the Lotus folks (as we did back at Lotusphere this year). [...]

]]> http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2009/01/21/ls09/comment-page-1/#comment-288117 People Over Process » The State of Analyst Relations - Interview Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:57:54 +0000 http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2009/01/21/ls09/#comment-288117 [...] at Lotusphere this year, John Simonds interviewed me as the first part in a new podcast of his, “An Analyst’s View [...] [...] at Lotusphere this year, John Simonds interviewed me as the first part in a new podcast of his, “An Analyst’s View [...]

]]> http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2009/01/21/ls09/comment-page-1/#comment-288003 People Over Process » Team Cloud at IBM Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:47:01 +0000 http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2009/01/21/ls09/#comment-288003 [...] productize that and sell it pronto!” While at Lotusphere this year, I heard that some of the LotusLive.com product came from that work. See more about the HiPODs in this 2007 [...] [...] productize that and sell it pronto!” While at Lotusphere this year, I heard that some of the LotusLive.com product came from that work. See more about the HiPODs in this 2007 [...]

]]> http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2009/01/21/ls09/comment-page-1/#comment-287578 Cote' Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:46:08 +0000 http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2009/01/21/ls09/#comment-287578 Ed: indeed. Batting around numbers is always a rat-hole of qualifications, esp. when the numbers get enterprise. Ed: indeed. Batting around numbers is always a rat-hole of qualifications, esp. when the numbers get enterprise.

]]> http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2009/01/21/ls09/comment-page-1/#comment-287436 Ed Brill Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:57:44 +0000 http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2009/01/21/ls09/#comment-287436 Michael, I am not sure that the $340,000 question is accurate. One of the fallacies of the Google $50/user/year number is it assumes that you have zero additional costs. That couldn't be more wrong. Not only do you still have to worry about connectivity and bandwidth, you have to have some kind of 1st level help desk, someone to administer directory management, someone to handle compliance requests, and someone to think about rich client deployments for offline usage. I am a huge believer in driving down the operational costs for messaging, but I also think it's critical to look at the full force and cost of the operation. Michael, I am not sure that the $340,000 question is accurate. One of the fallacies of the Google $50/user/year number is it assumes that you have zero additional costs. That couldn't be more wrong. Not only do you still have to worry about connectivity and bandwidth, you have to have some kind of 1st level help desk, someone to administer directory management, someone to handle compliance requests, and someone to think about rich client deployments for offline usage. I am a huge believer in driving down the operational costs for messaging, but I also think it's critical to look at the full force and cost of the operation.

]]> http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2009/01/21/ls09/comment-page-1/#comment-287060 Drunk & Retired - DrunkAndRetired.com # 144 - Ripple Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:40:20 +0000 http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2009/01/21/ls09/#comment-287060 [...] A little bit on Lotusphere 2009 [...] [...] A little bit on Lotusphere 2009 [...]

]]> http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2009/01/21/ls09/comment-page-1/#comment-286626 People Over Process » IT Management Podcast #33 - The Night John Saw Stevie Ray Vaughn in a Taco Place Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:39:54 +0000 http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2009/01/21/ls09/#comment-286626 [...] Lotusphere entering IBM into SaaS. Is “good enough” good enough? [...] [...] Lotusphere entering IBM into SaaS. Is “good enough” good enough? [...]

]]> http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2009/01/21/ls09/comment-page-1/#comment-286285 James Governor’s Monkchips » How I Was Wrong About The Fearsome Engine That is IBM, Or, Thoughts on Software and Elephants Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:59:12 +0000 http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2009/01/21/ls09/#comment-286285 [...] taking enough risks when it came to creating new markets. Everything always had to be all about the The Companies Who Run The World, the Fortune-We-Don’t-Use-37Signals-Hundred. IBM wasn’t going to invest in things without a guaranteed payoff- R&D becomes a purely [...] [...] taking enough risks when it came to creating new markets. Everything always had to be all about the The Companies Who Run The World, the Fortune-We-Don’t-Use-37Signals-Hundred. IBM wasn’t going to invest in things without a guaranteed payoff- R&D becomes a purely [...]

]]>