<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Return of Paying for Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/07/28/the-return-of-paying-for-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/07/28/the-return-of-paying-for-software/</link>
	<description>One foot in the muck, the other in utopia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:28:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Windows Update &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is The New Windows 7 Anytime Upgrade Worthwhile? - WindowsDailyNews.com</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/07/28/the-return-of-paying-for-software/comment-page-1/#comment-313661</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows Update &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is The New Windows 7 Anytime Upgrade Worthwhile? - WindowsDailyNews.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/07/28/the-return-of-paying-for-software/#comment-313661</guid>
		<description>[...] reading this, I instantly thought about Cote excellent post titled “The Return of Paying for Software” from last summer.&#160; Cote wrote: “When it comes to making money with software, the iPhone App [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reading this, I instantly thought about Cote excellent post titled “The Return of Paying for Software” from last summer.&nbsp; Cote wrote: “When it comes to making money with software, the iPhone App [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Would you upgrade anytime with Windows 7? &#171; rand($thoughts);</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/07/28/the-return-of-paying-for-software/comment-page-1/#comment-313119</link>
		<dc:creator>Would you upgrade anytime with Windows 7? &#171; rand($thoughts);</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 04:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/07/28/the-return-of-paying-for-software/#comment-313119</guid>
		<description>[...] reading this, I instantly thought about Cote excellent post titled &#8220;The Return of Paying for Software&#8221; from last summer.  Cote wrote: &#8220;When it comes to making money with software, the iPhone App [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reading this, I instantly thought about Cote excellent post titled &#8220;The Return of Paying for Software&#8221; from last summer.  Cote wrote: &#8220;When it comes to making money with software, the iPhone App [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Governor&#8217;s Monkchips &#187; Why Rail Info and the New York Times should indeed be free</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/07/28/the-return-of-paying-for-software/comment-page-1/#comment-307897</link>
		<dc:creator>James Governor&#8217;s Monkchips &#187; Why Rail Info and the New York Times should indeed be free</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/07/28/the-return-of-paying-for-software/#comment-307897</guid>
		<description>[...] I was reading an interesting post today by Rory Cellan-Jones about National Rail Inquiries decision to cut off a free service and replace it with its own for pay version. If you asked Cote he might just say that&#8217;s the way the wind is blowing - fee is the new free - The Return of Paying for Software. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I was reading an interesting post today by Rory Cellan-Jones about National Rail Inquiries decision to cut off a free service and replace it with its own for pay version. If you asked Cote he might just say that&#8217;s the way the wind is blowing &#8211; fee is the new free &#8211; The Return of Paying for Software. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will you pay for open source in 2009? &#171; rand($thoughts);</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/07/28/the-return-of-paying-for-software/comment-page-1/#comment-279724</link>
		<dc:creator>Will you pay for open source in 2009? &#171; rand($thoughts);</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 06:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/07/28/the-return-of-paying-for-software/#comment-279724</guid>
		<description>[...] off, I think Dave is taking some liberties with Cote&#8217;s original prediction about paying for software. Cote wrote: &#8220;Small Change for Small Applications: When it comes to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] off, I think Dave is taking some liberties with Cote&#8217;s original prediction about paying for software. Cote wrote: &#8220;Small Change for Small Applications: When it comes to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/07/28/the-return-of-paying-for-software/comment-page-1/#comment-205241</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/07/28/the-return-of-paying-for-software/#comment-205241</guid>
		<description>I think this culture is Apple localized.  Windows developers seem to pirate their software, and Linux folks get it for free.

I was just discussing this the other day with a friend, as I (as a Linux user) was stunned by the fact that if you want to use IRC on Mac you need to buy a $10 piece of software.  I suspect that the culture which values paying slightly more for design is a culture that doesn&#039;t mind dropping $10 here, and $5 there for software that does small things on the desktop.

So, while I&#039;m sure that you are seeing this more and more, I&#039;d be really curious if you are seeing it outside the Apple sphere of influence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this culture is Apple localized.  Windows developers seem to pirate their software, and Linux folks get it for free.</p>
<p>I was just discussing this the other day with a friend, as I (as a Linux user) was stunned by the fact that if you want to use IRC on Mac you need to buy a $10 piece of software.  I suspect that the culture which values paying slightly more for design is a culture that doesn&#8217;t mind dropping $10 here, and $5 there for software that does small things on the desktop.</p>
<p>So, while I&#8217;m sure that you are seeing this more and more, I&#8217;d be really curious if you are seeing it outside the Apple sphere of influence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TravisV</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/07/28/the-return-of-paying-for-software/comment-page-1/#comment-204900</link>
		<dc:creator>TravisV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/07/28/the-return-of-paying-for-software/#comment-204900</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s amazing how reluctantly we consumers pay for certain types of (actually valuable) software when you consider the other types of abuse that we sign up for:  

With DirecTV or Comcast - you buy their hardware upgrades (&quot;HD Receivers&quot; for example), then they milk you for extra monthly connectivity charges.  

With credit cards, despite the fact that we&#039;re paying richly for short term loans, we&#039;re also now subjected to all sorts of b.s. service upsell attempts any time we talk to a human being (which people must be buying, based on how hard they&#039;re pushing it).  And of course, if you actually sign up for one, it&#039;s auto- recurring billing (because they&#039;d hate to lose you as a customer just because the service happens to suck).

A lot of these practices that have been going on in the consumer / home services world (and particularly with monopolies) revolves around marginally valuable services that are presented in a misleading way, with predatory pricing and recurring billing schemes.  And most of us are signed up.  

But if the online service that we&#039;ve been using for free for five years and love to death all of a sudden tries to charge us $1.99 per year - well, dammit, we&#039;re not going to put up with THAT ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s amazing how reluctantly we consumers pay for certain types of (actually valuable) software when you consider the other types of abuse that we sign up for:  </p>
<p>With DirecTV or Comcast &#8211; you buy their hardware upgrades (&#8220;HD Receivers&#8221; for example), then they milk you for extra monthly connectivity charges.  </p>
<p>With credit cards, despite the fact that we&#8217;re paying richly for short term loans, we&#8217;re also now subjected to all sorts of b.s. service upsell attempts any time we talk to a human being (which people must be buying, based on how hard they&#8217;re pushing it).  And of course, if you actually sign up for one, it&#8217;s auto- recurring billing (because they&#8217;d hate to lose you as a customer just because the service happens to suck).</p>
<p>A lot of these practices that have been going on in the consumer / home services world (and particularly with monopolies) revolves around marginally valuable services that are presented in a misleading way, with predatory pricing and recurring billing schemes.  And most of us are signed up.  </p>
<p>But if the online service that we&#8217;ve been using for free for five years and love to death all of a sudden tries to charge us $1.99 per year &#8211; well, dammit, we&#8217;re not going to put up with THAT ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
