Comments on: Open Source and IBM’s SOA-think – IBM Impact Day Two http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/04/08/open-source-and-ibms-soa-think-ibm-impact-day-two/ One foot in the muck, the other in utopia Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:28:43 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: (Not) Live from IMPACT - a blogger wrap » Smart (Enough) Systems, the blog http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/04/08/open-source-and-ibms-soa-think-ibm-impact-day-two/comment-page-1/#comment-208703 (Not) Live from IMPACT - a blogger wrap » Smart (Enough) Systems, the blog Fri, 08 Aug 2008 17:53:12 +0000 http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/04/08/open-source-and-ibms-soa-think-ibm-impact-day-two/#comment-208703 [...] Open Source and IBM’s SOA-think - IBM Impact Day Two (Michael Cote) [...] [...] Open Source and IBM’s SOA-think – IBM Impact Day Two (Michael Cote) [...]

]]> By: Impact 2008: Final Day - Blogs | danzrobok.com http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/04/08/open-source-and-ibms-soa-think-ibm-impact-day-two/comment-page-1/#comment-167954 Impact 2008: Final Day - Blogs | danzrobok.com Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:34:01 +0000 http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/04/08/open-source-and-ibms-soa-think-ibm-impact-day-two/#comment-167954 [...] Rosenberg expands on a point raised by Cote of RedMonk about the lack of OSS mention at [...] [...] Rosenberg expands on a point raised by Cote of RedMonk about the lack of OSS mention at [...]

]]> By: Dan Zrobok http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/04/08/open-source-and-ibms-soa-think-ibm-impact-day-two/comment-page-1/#comment-167080 Dan Zrobok Tue, 08 Apr 2008 17:30:12 +0000 http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/04/08/open-source-and-ibms-soa-think-ibm-impact-day-two/#comment-167080 "theoretically faster release cycles (though, I’m curious if this OSS folklore is true)," I've heard this as well in a few posts on my own blog and I wonder. Is it really that the products are that much better or is it that the developers themselves are more enthusiastic towards the products and thus, work more,harder,faster with them? I'd love to see a blind-study that slapped some IBM logo's on a piece of open source and gave it to unknowing unbiased developers. Would you see "WebSphere-like" cycles or these viciously fast new OSS cycles? “theoretically faster release cycles (though, I’m curious if this OSS folklore is true),”

I’ve heard this as well in a few posts on my own blog and I wonder. Is it really that the products are that much better or is it that the developers themselves are more enthusiastic towards the products and thus, work more,harder,faster with them?

I’d love to see a blind-study that slapped some IBM logo’s on a piece of open source and gave it to unknowing unbiased developers. Would you see “WebSphere-like” cycles or these viciously fast new OSS cycles?

]]>