<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Idea of SOA - IBM Impact Day One</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/04/07/the-idea-of-soa-ibm-impact-day-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/04/07/the-idea-of-soa-ibm-impact-day-one/</link>
	<description>One foot in the muck, the other in utopia</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: (Not) Live from IMPACT - a blogger wrap &#187; Smart (Enough) Systems, the blog</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/04/07/the-idea-of-soa-ibm-impact-day-one/#comment-168913</link>
		<dc:creator>(Not) Live from IMPACT - a blogger wrap &#187; Smart (Enough) Systems, the blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/04/07/the-idea-of-soa-ibm-impact-day-two/#comment-168913</guid>
		<description>[...] The Idea of SOA - IBM Impact Day One (Michael Cote) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Idea of SOA - IBM Impact Day One (Michael Cote) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cote</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/04/07/the-idea-of-soa-ibm-impact-day-one/#comment-167521</link>
		<dc:creator>cote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 01:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/04/07/the-idea-of-soa-ibm-impact-day-two/#comment-167521</guid>
		<description>Dan: makes sense, thanks for the clarification.

Ric: yeah...it seems like closed source vendors, just by nature of usually having been around longer in this space, are the ones who make claims to scalability first-most, if not "second-most."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan: makes sense, thanks for the clarification.</p>
<p>Ric: yeah&#8230;it seems like closed source vendors, just by nature of usually having been around longer in this space, are the ones who make claims to scalability first-most, if not &#8220;second-most.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Live from IMPACT - Other bloggers &#187; Smart (Enough) Systems, the blog</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/04/07/the-idea-of-soa-ibm-impact-day-one/#comment-166924</link>
		<dc:creator>Live from IMPACT - Other bloggers &#187; Smart (Enough) Systems, the blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 04:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/04/07/the-idea-of-soa-ibm-impact-day-two/#comment-166924</guid>
		<description>[...] Michael Cote (Redmonk) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michael Cote (Redmonk) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ric</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/04/07/the-idea-of-soa-ibm-impact-day-one/#comment-166884</link>
		<dc:creator>Ric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 01:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/04/07/the-idea-of-soa-ibm-impact-day-two/#comment-166884</guid>
		<description>Well we got 60 to an SOA conf in Sydney a few weeks back - must be IBM's pulling power .... 
I'm not sure how much of a differentiator the 'scaling' aspect is ... Oracle/BEA, ClearCape (?) and Sonic could make the same claims (and probably do!)
Keep plugging on that "SOA is an idea" theme ... it's not a product set.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well we got 60 to an SOA conf in Sydney a few weeks back - must be IBM&#8217;s pulling power &#8230;.<br />
I&#8217;m not sure how much of a differentiator the &#8217;scaling&#8217; aspect is &#8230; Oracle/BEA, ClearCape (?) and Sonic could make the same claims (and probably do!)<br />
Keep plugging on that &#8220;SOA is an idea&#8221; theme &#8230; it&#8217;s not a product set.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: People Over Process &#187; How&#8217;s your T-Zone? - IBM Impact</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/04/07/the-idea-of-soa-ibm-impact-day-one/#comment-166877</link>
		<dc:creator>People Over Process &#187; How&#8217;s your T-Zone? - IBM Impact</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 01:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/04/07/the-idea-of-soa-ibm-impact-day-two/#comment-166877</guid>
		<description>[...] afternoon, IBM (of course) re-enforced and nuanced out it&#8217;s message about SOA&#8217;ness from this morning: SOA is the technology to build out what business&#8217;s want and IBM is the most mature, thus, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] afternoon, IBM (of course) re-enforced and nuanced out it&#8217;s message about SOA&#8217;ness from this morning: SOA is the technology to build out what business&#8217;s want and IBM is the most mature, thus, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Zrobok</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/04/07/the-idea-of-soa-ibm-impact-day-one/#comment-166803</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Zrobok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 19:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/04/07/the-idea-of-soa-ibm-impact-day-two/#comment-166803</guid>
		<description>"Native SCA” (?)"

In WebSphere Process Server, you have various ways your module can interact with dependencies. It could be a Web Service (SOAP/HTTP) call, a JMS queue, an EJB....Or, in the special case of one process server calling another process server module, you can use the "SCA Binding". 

It's basically as fast doing a method invocation on a java class because SCA bindings (mostly) occur within the same JVM.

The reason you see "Native SCA" buzzword in the slide is to allude to how fast the binding is when compared to SOAP or JMS where you need to serialize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Native SCA” (?)&#8221;</p>
<p>In WebSphere Process Server, you have various ways your module can interact with dependencies. It could be a Web Service (SOAP/HTTP) call, a JMS queue, an EJB&#8230;.Or, in the special case of one process server calling another process server module, you can use the &#8220;SCA Binding&#8221;. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s basically as fast doing a method invocation on a java class because SCA bindings (mostly) occur within the same JVM.</p>
<p>The reason you see &#8220;Native SCA&#8221; buzzword in the slide is to allude to how fast the binding is when compared to SOAP or JMS where you need to serialize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Impact 2008: Dana Gardner and Michael Coté Blogging the Conference &#124; danzrobok.com</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/04/07/the-idea-of-soa-ibm-impact-day-one/#comment-166801</link>
		<dc:creator>Impact 2008: Dana Gardner and Michael Coté Blogging the Conference &#124; danzrobok.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 19:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/04/07/the-idea-of-soa-ibm-impact-day-two/#comment-166801</guid>
		<description>[...] Thanks to Michael Coté who is also blogging the conference and has his recap of the first few hours of Impact. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thanks to Michael Coté who is also blogging the conference and has his recap of the first few hours of Impact. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Impact 2008: Dana Gardner Blogging the Conference &#124; danzrobok.com</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/04/07/the-idea-of-soa-ibm-impact-day-one/#comment-166800</link>
		<dc:creator>Impact 2008: Dana Gardner Blogging the Conference &#124; danzrobok.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 19:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/04/07/the-idea-of-soa-ibm-impact-day-two/#comment-166800</guid>
		<description>[...] Thanks to Michael Coté who is also blogging the conference and has his recap of the first few hours of Impact. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thanks to Michael Coté who is also blogging the conference and has his recap of the first few hours of Impact. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
