<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Klir Closing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/08/01/klir-closing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/08/01/klir-closing/</link>
	<description>One foot in the muck, the other in utopia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 15:13:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3 Important Things from the Microsoft Management Summit 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/08/01/klir-closing/comment-page-1/#comment-343661</link>
		<dc:creator>3 Important Things from the Microsoft Management Summit 2011</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/08/01/klir-closing/#comment-343661</guid>
		<description>[...] Windows Server, Dynamics, and SharePoint) is knowledge-base served up as a SaaS â€“ something klir (RIP) and Splunk have played around with â€“ to make this kind of collaborative IT management work, you [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Windows Server, Dynamics, and SharePoint) is knowledge-base served up as a SaaS â€“ something klir (RIP) and Splunk have played around with â€“ to make this kind of collaborative IT management work, you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CotÃ©&#039;s People Over Process &#187; 3 Important Things from the Microsoft Management Summit 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/08/01/klir-closing/comment-page-1/#comment-343658</link>
		<dc:creator>CotÃ©&#039;s People Over Process &#187; 3 Important Things from the Microsoft Management Summit 2011</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/08/01/klir-closing/#comment-343658</guid>
		<description>[...] Server, Dynamics, and SharePoint) is knowledge-base served up as a SaaS &#8211; something klir (RIP) and Splunk have played around with &#8211; to make this kind of collaborative IT management work, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Server, Dynamics, and SharePoint) is knowledge-base served up as a SaaS &#8211; something klir (RIP) and Splunk have played around with &#8211; to make this kind of collaborative IT management work, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CotÃ©&#39;s People Over Process &#187; GoToManage &#8211; Citrix Buys Paglo &#8211; Quick Analysis</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/08/01/klir-closing/comment-page-1/#comment-341468</link>
		<dc:creator>CotÃ©&#39;s People Over Process &#187; GoToManage &#8211; Citrix Buys Paglo &#8211; Quick Analysis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/08/01/klir-closing/#comment-341468</guid>
		<description>[...] SaaS angle: only a handful of IT Management vendors try this approach, and most seem to slink away (or worse). Citrix Online says this purchase will expand their GoTo portfolio, building on their mid-market [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SaaS angle: only a handful of IT Management vendors try this approach, and most seem to slink away (or worse). Citrix Online says this purchase will expand their GoTo portfolio, building on their mid-market [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: People Over Process &#187; AccelOps All-in-One IT Management</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/08/01/klir-closing/comment-page-1/#comment-332084</link>
		<dc:creator>People Over Process &#187; AccelOps All-in-One IT Management</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/08/01/klir-closing/#comment-332084</guid>
		<description>[...] memories of 2003!). For the vendors, the SaaS model hasn&#8217;t been a proven slam-dunk - witness the demise of Klir and the lack of SaaS options from the so-called Little 4 crew. That said, I&#8217;m the last person [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] memories of 2003!). For the vendors, the SaaS model hasn&#8217;t been a proven slam-dunk &#8211; witness the demise of Klir and the lack of SaaS options from the so-called Little 4 crew. That said, I&#8217;m the last person [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: People Over Process &#187; ManageEngine adds SaaS</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/08/01/klir-closing/comment-page-1/#comment-299119</link>
		<dc:creator>People Over Process &#187; ManageEngine adds SaaS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/08/01/klir-closing/#comment-299119</guid>
		<description>[...] startup called Klir tried to sell an IT management as a SaaS offering, but their VCs shut them down before they had much of a chance to try it out wide-scale. FiveRuns started down this path, but then went off the rails (hey-o!). There&#8217;s also Paglo [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] startup called Klir tried to sell an IT management as a SaaS offering, but their VCs shut them down before they had much of a chance to try it out wide-scale. FiveRuns started down this path, but then went off the rails (hey-o!). There&#8217;s also Paglo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Godse</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/08/01/klir-closing/comment-page-1/#comment-289501</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Godse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 17:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/08/01/klir-closing/#comment-289501</guid>
		<description>SaaS is the way to go. It is easy to buy because there are usually no capital expenses up front (e.g. servers, software licenses, installation). It&#039;s usually pay as you go, and it is an operating expense. If you run low on cash, you can usually ratchet back without huge penalties. 

It is good for providers too because it provides a recurring revenue stream. It&#039;s a lot easier to plan a business around recurring revenue streams. 

Working for a SaaS provider is better too because if you have to host/operate the software that you write, you will be more concerned with quality. Also, you will have motivation to deliver small amounts of value frequently so that you can continuously and smoothly improve cash flow.  

This is contrasted against writing software for software product companies which deliver on death-march deadlines and then fire redundant developers after the software is released. 

Google&#039;s offering is interesting because it is really inexpensive (at the high end) or free (at the low end).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SaaS is the way to go. It is easy to buy because there are usually no capital expenses up front (e.g. servers, software licenses, installation). It&#8217;s usually pay as you go, and it is an operating expense. If you run low on cash, you can usually ratchet back without huge penalties. </p>
<p>It is good for providers too because it provides a recurring revenue stream. It&#8217;s a lot easier to plan a business around recurring revenue streams. </p>
<p>Working for a SaaS provider is better too because if you have to host/operate the software that you write, you will be more concerned with quality. Also, you will have motivation to deliver small amounts of value frequently so that you can continuously and smoothly improve cash flow.  </p>
<p>This is contrasted against writing software for software product companies which deliver on death-march deadlines and then fire redundant developers after the software is released. </p>
<p>Google&#8217;s offering is interesting because it is really inexpensive (at the high end) or free (at the low end).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: People Over Process &#187; IT Management for The Big Switch - Mid-afternoon Speculation and Blue-skying</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/08/01/klir-closing/comment-page-1/#comment-129136</link>
		<dc:creator>People Over Process &#187; IT Management for The Big Switch - Mid-afternoon Speculation and Blue-skying</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 20:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/08/01/klir-closing/#comment-129136</guid>
		<description>[...] that. People like FiveRuns inherently have this, but the IT Management as SaaS providers out there are getting harder to find. I know BMC has it stuffed in a closet somewhere, but only because I used to work on it. New people [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that. People like FiveRuns inherently have this, but the IT Management as SaaS providers out there are getting harder to find. I know BMC has it stuffed in a closet somewhere, but only because I used to work on it. New people [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: People Over Process &#187; Paglo Briefing - Search over your IT Junk, and hosted/SaaS too</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/08/01/klir-closing/comment-page-1/#comment-109406</link>
		<dc:creator>People Over Process &#187; Paglo Briefing - Search over your IT Junk, and hosted/SaaS too</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/08/01/klir-closing/#comment-109406</guid>
		<description>[...] Thus, Paglo is a SaaS IT Management offering - a rare find now-a-days, along with FiveRuns, Service-now.com, NetCraft&#8217;s Versiera, and BMC&#8217;s Service Desk Express as the only ones that immediately spring to my mind&#8230;RIP Klir? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thus, Paglo is a SaaS IT Management offering &#8211; a rare find now-a-days, along with FiveRuns, Service-now.com, NetCraft&#8217;s Versiera, and BMC&#8217;s Service Desk Express as the only ones that immediately spring to my mind&#8230;RIP Klir? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: People Over Process &#187; Microsoft System Center Essentials</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/08/01/klir-closing/comment-page-1/#comment-56103</link>
		<dc:creator>People Over Process &#187; Microsoft System Center Essentials</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 16:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/08/01/klir-closing/#comment-56103</guid>
		<description>[...] options along with handing off scaling hassle to Microsoft would be appealing to SCE customers. (Recently shut-down Klir is in the area, so there&#8217;s a freshly available talent pool [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] options along with handing off scaling hassle to Microsoft would be appealing to SCE customers. (Recently shut-down Klir is in the area, so there&#8217;s a freshly available talent pool [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Sourcing Discontinued Software - Fate of Klir&#8217;s IP &#171; FR Test Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/08/01/klir-closing/comment-page-1/#comment-54829</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Sourcing Discontinued Software - Fate of Klir&#8217;s IP &#171; FR Test Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 20:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/08/01/klir-closing/#comment-54829</guid>
		<description>[...] company thatâ€™s shuttering operations: Klir Technologies (see Coteâ€™s blog on the closing here) which begs the question of what should happen to a companyâ€™s intellectual property when it shuts [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] company thatâ€™s shuttering operations: Klir Technologies (see Coteâ€™s blog on the closing here) which begs the question of what should happen to a companyâ€™s intellectual property when it shuts [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

