<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eclipse Europa</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/06/27/eclipse-europa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/06/27/eclipse-europa/</link>
	<description>One foot in the muck, the other in utopia</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: 1000000s &#187; What&#8217;s the Europa buzz?</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/06/27/eclipse-europa/#comment-131761</link>
		<dc:creator>1000000s &#187; What&#8217;s the Europa buzz?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/06/27/eclipse-europa/#comment-131761</guid>
		<description>[...] BlogsOne Foot in the Muck, the Other in UtopiaCaffeine Induced CodingErik&#8217;s&#8230;Hmm&#8230;Camping out For Europadigital : meditation [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BlogsOne Foot in the Muck, the Other in UtopiaCaffeine Induced CodingErik&#8217;s&#8230;Hmm&#8230;Camping out For Europadigital : meditation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: People Over Process &#187; Mylyn Conversation and Demo</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/06/27/eclipse-europa/#comment-45346</link>
		<dc:creator>People Over Process &#187; Mylyn Conversation and Demo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 22:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/06/27/eclipse-europa/#comment-45346</guid>
		<description>[...] mentioned Mylyn/Mylar several times before &#8212; here and most recently in the context of Europa &#8212; an it&#8217;s one of my favorite Eclipse [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mentioned Mylyn/Mylar several times before &#8212; here and most recently in the context of Europa &#8212; an it&#8217;s one of my favorite Eclipse [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eclipse Europa Coverage So Far &#171; Ian Skerrett</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/06/27/eclipse-europa/#comment-44740</link>
		<dc:creator>Eclipse Europa Coverage So Far &#171; Ian Skerrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/06/27/eclipse-europa/#comment-44740</guid>
		<description>[...] Cote from Redmonk probably had the best coverage by an analyst. Cote really gets this stuff. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cote from Redmonk probably had the best coverage by an analyst. Cote really gets this stuff. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Dee</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/06/27/eclipse-europa/#comment-44588</link>
		<dc:creator>John Dee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 20:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/06/27/eclipse-europa/#comment-44588</guid>
		<description>Neil, this is just not constructive and I hope this tone is not representative of the OSGi community. Or is it?

We have JSR 277 and 291 overlapping. What should we do next? Kill one of them? Doesn't make sense to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil, this is just not constructive and I hope this tone is not representative of the OSGi community. Or is it?</p>
<p>We have JSR 277 and 291 overlapping. What should we do next? Kill one of them? Doesn&#8217;t make sense to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eclipse for Everything - javanese &#187; Eclipse Europa 릴리즈!!!</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/06/27/eclipse-europa/#comment-43719</link>
		<dc:creator>Eclipse for Everything - javanese &#187; Eclipse Europa 릴리즈!!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/06/27/eclipse-europa/#comment-43719</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/06/27/eclipse-europa/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/06/27/eclipse-europa/" rel="nofollow">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/06/27/eclipse-europa/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pure Danger Tech &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Java 7 Roundup (June 28th)</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/06/27/eclipse-europa/#comment-43624</link>
		<dc:creator>Pure Danger Tech &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Java 7 Roundup (June 28th)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 04:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/06/27/eclipse-europa/#comment-43624</guid>
		<description>[...] relationship in JSR 277 and JSR 291. Along the same lines, you might be interested in Coté&#8217;s take on OSGi vs JSR 277 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] relationship in JSR 277 and JSR 291. Along the same lines, you might be interested in Coté&#8217;s take on OSGi vs JSR 277 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Bartlett</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/06/27/eclipse-europa/#comment-43525</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Bartlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 16:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/06/27/eclipse-europa/#comment-43525</guid>
		<description>OSGi wasn't developed inside the JCP "church", but it certainly now has a seat in the choir with JSR 291. I wonder if that changes the game for those whose devotion to JCP is paramount. Or do they just care that the high priest himself (Sun) voted against the JSR, in opposition to the rest of the priesthood?

Another aspect of the NetBeans versus Eclipse comparison, aside from focus on the platform, is the community. I don't need to tell you how enormous the Eclipse community is. How about NetBeans'? It appears to be a community consisting of just Sun, and that's not healthy. Even Microsoft does better at building an ecosystem around Visual Studio, despite all their devious license terms and occasional suing of valuable business partners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OSGi wasn&#8217;t developed inside the JCP &#8220;church&#8221;, but it certainly now has a seat in the choir with JSR 291. I wonder if that changes the game for those whose devotion to JCP is paramount. Or do they just care that the high priest himself (Sun) voted against the JSR, in opposition to the rest of the priesthood?</p>
<p>Another aspect of the NetBeans versus Eclipse comparison, aside from focus on the platform, is the community. I don&#8217;t need to tell you how enormous the Eclipse community is. How about NetBeans&#8217;? It appears to be a community consisting of just Sun, and that&#8217;s not healthy. Even Microsoft does better at building an ecosystem around Visual Studio, despite all their devious license terms and occasional suing of valuable business partners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cote</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/06/27/eclipse-europa/#comment-43498</link>
		<dc:creator>cote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 14:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/06/27/eclipse-europa/#comment-43498</guid>
		<description>John: I agree, and the Java component/module topic is actually one of the top three, if not the top thing, I talk about with Java people now-a-days. As I've told all of them, I'd really like to do a podcast, a post, a panel, or some other sort of public discussion with all sides involved. Obviously, it's worth writing on more frequently, so thanks for the input ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John: I agree, and the Java component/module topic is actually one of the top three, if not the top thing, I talk about with Java people now-a-days. As I&#8217;ve told all of them, I&#8217;d really like to do a podcast, a post, a panel, or some other sort of public discussion with all sides involved. Obviously, it&#8217;s worth writing on more frequently, so thanks for the input ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Dee</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/06/27/eclipse-europa/#comment-43462</link>
		<dc:creator>John Dee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/06/27/eclipse-europa/#comment-43462</guid>
		<description>Thanks cote'. I guess I was hoping for more analysis on how this should move forward. It is not a question of incompatible "alternatives", only incompatible people. The technologies can and should live together.
Great posts and podcasts btw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks cote&#8217;. I guess I was hoping for more analysis on how this should move forward. It is not a question of incompatible &#8220;alternatives&#8221;, only incompatible people. The technologies can and should live together.<br />
Great posts and podcasts btw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-06-28 &#187; SDLC Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/06/27/eclipse-europa/#comment-43435</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2007-06-28 &#187; SDLC Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 02:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/06/27/eclipse-europa/#comment-43435</guid>
		<description>[...] People Over Process » Eclipse Europa Eclipse Europa review by Cote: &#8220;3 interesting dimensions to the Europa release: 1) A platform for platforms 2) More tools for programmers 3) A move into the server-side&#8221; (tags: ide eclipse europa) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] People Over Process » Eclipse Europa Eclipse Europa review by Cote: &#8220;3 interesting dimensions to the Europa release: 1) A platform for platforms 2) More tools for programmers 3) A move into the server-side&#8221; (tags: ide eclipse europa) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
