Blogs

RedMonk

Adobe SaaS Offerings

Last week at the Adobe Analyst Summit, I encountered several SaaS offerings from Adobe that I hadn’t fully thought about or even know about before. The two interesting take-aways for me were:

  • Adobe doesn’t seem to have gotten much attention for the SaaS offerings it has.
  • Adobe uses SaaS more as a feature — or an “end-point” — than the sort of all-encompassing replacement for desktop technologies.

SOA End Points

This last point is most interesting to me as I’ve come to appreciate the concept of being an end point in an SOA world. I believe it was Dave Rosenberg of MuleSource that I first heard that phrasing from: the point being that in an SOA world (or, the public web which I consider “the first” and most successful SOA), any given piece of software has to act like a part of a larger system instead of as a whole.

On the implementor side, this is a major shift in thinking: the natural tendency of software, esp. commercial software, is to deliver on suite dreams and do everything.

Adobe’s End Points

So, what are Adobe’s SaaS offerings at the moment? They are:

Adobe Document Center

Document Center this is a hosted version of Adobe LiveCycle, in two flavors: regular and “pro.” Essentially, Document Center lets you share, well, documents with other people and manage the DRM around those docs. PDF + LiveCycle allows you to embed DRM in documents you send out to do things like limit who can see the document, track who looks at the document and when, and even expire the document. Where technologically possible — via plugins — other documents like .doc and .xls files can (or will?) be DRM’ed as well.

As you can imagine, the PDF crew analysts liked this quite a bit. Back at Adobe MAX, I sat in on a demo of some of this functionality in LiveCycles and it was, technologically, quite nifty.

One of the unanswered questions (because I haven’t asked enough yet) I have around the open standard’ing of PDF is around this technology: will this functionality be part of the ISO standard, or is it some sort of “extension”?

Acrobat Connect

Formally known as “Breeze” (a much better name), Acrobat Connect is Adobe’s desktop sharing platform. You know, like WebEx. In RedMonk’s experience, Connect is the easiest to use of the many desktop sharing services we have to use daily (WebEx, GoToMeeting, and occasionally, Microsoft LiveMeeting). Adobe sells a hosted, SaaS installation of Connect for folks who don’t want to run their own installation.

One interesting point is that Adobe is promoting the idea of a “persistent room,” nicely addressed by URL. That is, instead of going to some URL and having to go put in a meeting number, any given person or team has a permanent URL, for example, to make one up, http://connect.acrobat.com/redmonk/. One of the scenerios in the Adobe presentation was to put it on your business card. Now, that’s no big differentiator (in that it can, if it hasn’t already been, be copied), but it’s a nice idea.

One little question I didn’t raise at the time was: why Acrobat Connect? That seems a little strange, doesn’t it?

Adobe Remix

Remix is a hosted video editing service that (currently) works with Photobucket. It does stripped down video editing, pulling together clips and even editing clips (cutting out unwanted video). Once you edit the clip, it’s hosted at Photobucket, and you get the (now) usual HTML code to embed it in web pages.

CNET’s Josh Lowensohn has a much more in-depth write-up and screencast.

Stock Photos

As part of Adobe Bridge (a sort of spanning layer in in the Creative Suite, as I understand it), Stock Photos is a service that provides just that: browsing and purchasing stock photos as provided by Adobe.

James actually commented to Tom Hale (who was giving the presentation on Adobe SaaS) something along the lines of “that doesn’t seem like a very good space to be in, for how saturated and cut-throat it must be.” To which the reply was a sort of “moving right along” agreement. That said, it seems like the opportunity to create a channel between all of the online photos — including things like Creative Commons search in flickr — would be excellent. I use the CC search on flickr almost exclusively for my stock photos in Keynote, and I’d love it if it was just baked into the software, saving me the hassle of going from the web to my desktop applications.

kuler

kuler

Yesterday I mentioned kuler in passing. Of all the Adobe SaaS apps, it’s both the simplest and coolest. (OK, maybe buying stock photos is the simplest: you got me!) Essentially, people go to kuler.adobe.com and can create and browse color schemes.

Once you’ve created or found one you like, you can suck it into Illustrator, PhotoShop, and InDesign as an Adobe Swatch Exchange file. Of more interest to the end point idea, those products in Creative Suite 3 integrates directly with kuler. Or, if you’re not using one of those products, you can cut-n-paste out the RGB hex, CMYK, and several other color-to-number values.

There’s even RSS feeds, an OS X dashboard widget, and a little “post this to del.icio.us” icon at the bottom of the page: they’re hip that whole Web 2.0 scene!

As a sort of pot-shot, kuler is a great example of the frustration with Flash apps when it comes to getting a URL for a particular “artifact” in a web application. I wanted to link to the color scheme in the above screen shot (“sleeping with ghosts” by “christain”), but, of course, the URL in Firefox was just http://kulur.adobe.com. Perhaps there’s some “here’s the link!” icon somewhere, and you could hunt it down in the RSS feed (?)…but…come on, it’s the web: URLs, bub!

knowhow

knowhow is a managed community of building up tips, tricks, and best practices for Adobe tools and, presumably, common scenerios and contexts people who use tools encounter. That is, you can go into the knowhow panel and find out what people are saying about the magic wand tool in Photoshop. At first, that may seem cheesy, but I imagine people do all sorts of Google searching for such info daily. Why not have it in the app?

The interesting aspect of knowhow is that it pulls some of it’s content from a del.icio.us account. Adobe is essentially tag gardening with it’s del.icio.us knowhow account. In the FAQ, they even (quite enthusiastically) ask people to for: them with content. So far, knowhow has 3 “fans” (4 after I added it ;>) in del.icio.us: but, hey, it just came out.

I’m not sure if it’s part of knowhow or something else, but Adobe also has a hosted knowledge-base/in-tool panel integration service around CSS tips and work-arounds in different browsers.

As with kuler, knowhow is also from Adobe Labs and is now integrated into CS3.

Device Central

In a nut-shell, Device Central is a hosted repository of profiles for simulating tests on different handsets and mobile devices. As a developer in that space, you (hopefully) want to test on the widest range of possible devices. Of course, you can’t always spend the time and money to buy and use every single device, doing absurd things like taking it into elevators and tunnels to test out poor connectivity.

A with kuler, the architecture is a central store of these device profiles that integrates directly into Creative Suite desktop products. I’m not sure if there is or will be a community web-site where users can contribute or if Adobe maintains full control over the profiles. Of course, you know I’d suggest the first.

As context, at the Analyst Summit, as at Max 2006, Adobe plainly stated it’s intention to expand into the mobile and handset market device market. They’re using Flash (FlashCast and FlashLite) as a platform and they’ve signed some early deals with NTT DoCoMo and (recently) Verizon. So, naturally, being a tools company, you can see how Device Central would fit into the mobile device push.

Narrowing Down SaaS

Many of the SaaS technologies above are more features than full products. Hence the point of being an end point in an SOA rather than a complete suite. As such, though, they’re not giant revenue for Adobe as a company — the Connect numbers were projected to be the highest over the next few years.

But, even as “just features,” most of the above is incredibly interesting in that Adobe is doing SaaS right now. More importantly, they’re certainly taking it into consideration for their product lines. I often comment that most vendors don’t fully include the web and internet in their product management thinking. They don’t ask the question, “what would our software look like if we took the web for granted, as an integral part of all software and user experience?” So, it was fun to learn that Adobe has so many offerings, in use now, to study in reference to that thinking.

At the moment, the most interesting take-away (for existing vendors looking to go SaaS, at least) is to narrow down your SaaS efforts to the feature level instead of worrying about everything but the kitchen sink. As seen repeated in kuler, Device Central, and others, the basic pattern is creating and gardening a knowledge base community, and then pulling that knowledge into Adobe tools, such as in context sensitive panels. Taking this SaaS-as-feature approach, again, to me means eating some SaaS humble pie and asking how your software can work along side and with other software and services rather than being The Master Platform for everything.

Of course, I have open questions (pun!) with some of Adobe’s offerings above: namely, I’m not sure what the IP and access licensing is. Could GIMP integrate with kuler and knowhow? Could other Mobile/Handset IDE’s work with Device Central? I haven’t dug around too much for answers, but my hope is that the answers would be closer to yes than no. After all, in this version of SaaS, users are contributing a large part of the value — in color combos, CSS and Creative Suite tips, and even code — and I’d think that those users would like their content to be as maximally usable and portable as possible. And hey, don’t we all agree that platforms and tool thrive — yes, even, commercially — when they’re more open than not?

Disclaimer: Adobe is a client, as is MuleSource.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

by-sa

One Comment

  1. Posted September 28, 2011 at 12:27 am | Permalink

    Thanks for the share. Keep up the very good work, I’ll subscribe to your blog.

12 Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. By tecosystems » links for 2007-04-06 on 05 Apr 2007 at 11:29 pm

    [...] People Over Process » Blog Archive » Adobe SaaS Offerings “In RedMonk’s experience, Connect is the easiest to use of the many desktop sharing services we have to use daily (WebEx, GoToMeeting, and occasionally, Microsoft LiveMeeting).” – i love Breeze/Connect, great tool – even on Linux (tags: Breeze Connect Adobe Webex Gotomeeting Livemeeting) [...]

  2. By Is SaaS Toxic for Partners? « SmoothSpan Blog on 21 May 2007 at 2:50 pm

    [...] this and take all the business for themselves.  The natural tendency of ISV’s is to deliver on suite dreams and do everything, but the alternative may be a better answer for customers and the ISV [...]

  3. [...] Project “Share” should sound strongly related to an existing Adobe SaaS offering, Adobe Document Center. Indeed, I’d wager you can expect the two of them to merge or at least work closely together. [...]

  4. [...] I cataloged last year, Adobe actually has a lot of SaaSes running around. They acquired Buzzword and launched Share last [...]

  5. [...] Adobe to be getting out there into the PaaS world and figuring things out beyond Acrobat.com and it’s other cloud-ish offerings. Adobe is still being timid when it comes to “cloud computing.” That said, as I said [...]

  6. [...] on what Adobe has been doing in, as we call it now the cloud for sometime. They actually have had several hosted services for sometime, long enough to EoL some of them. Adobe acquired Buzzword, a hosted, Flex based word processor; [...]

  7. [...] an allergic reaction to hype, which can be endearing but also damaging at times. They’ve had a bevy of SaaS offerings for sometime now and more recently, the LiveCycle group has gotten their cloud buzz on. But when it comes to [...]

  8. [...] and their SaaS services are kept on too lean of a diet to help out at the corporate level (I’ve always thought that was a strategic error for Adobe, not focusing more on their SaaS offerings and PaaS-like platform potential – as context, [...]

  9. [...] a blog post RedMonk's Michael Coté wrote "In RedMonk's experience, Connect is the easiest to use of the many [...]

  10. [...] 荣誉提名:Adobe Connect Adobe Connect今天推出了一些新功能,比如编写扩展的功能,其易用性受到了Gartner和Red Monk的称赞。 [...]

  11. [...] var _wpcf7={cached:1}; body{background-color:#fed7ee;background-image:url('http://www.99ued.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/9bc8b7fa8d7ddb9ab58f312a.jpg&#039;);background-repeat:repeat;background-position:top center;background-attachment:scroll} Apple's 用户体验、UE研究、产品策划、产品规划、交互设计学习记 做一个用户的 super apple跳至正文首页关于案例← 互联网产品是做什么?2010å¹´10大企业产品 发表于 2010/12/09 ç”± apple å‰è¨€ï¼š2010年,这一年对于互联网这个行业而言,是不可思议的一年。那么多创新的产品,前所未有的战役,都让没有互联网从业者,感受到了无比的兴奋。这将是互联网这个行业的一个新的起点。~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~年度新产品:ChatterSalesforce.com Chatter算不上今年最具创新的产品,但是它是今年最成功的产品。目前Salesforceçš„87200家用户中已有60000家采用了这个平台,包括戴尔和诺基亚。该平台还支持Salesforce.com的社交CRM产品Service Cloud 2.0 å’ŒSales Cloud 2.0。W在厂商众多的情况下企业用户为什么会选择Chatter呢?Salesforce.com最大独特优势在于他们已经提供长达十年的可靠SaaS服务。正是这种在可靠性和可扩展性方面的声誉赢得了Facebook等用户。荣誉提名:SimplyBox SimplyBox是今年早些时候发布的一个企业级沟通协作产品,是今年最具创新性的产品。SimplyBox已经和甲骨文和SAP达成合作把自己的技术卖给其他公司。年度Email产品:Google AppsGoogle Apps已经成为微软在Email领域的一个真正对手。企业版Google Apps的发布及其联邦信息安全管理法案认证让Google可以在政府产品领域和微软一决高下。Google击败微软,赢得了为美国联邦总务管理局1.7万名员工提供Email和文档管理的合同。与此同时Google Apps的个人用户已经超过了3000万。荣誉提名:Xobni Xobni通过社交网站整合和高级搜索功能给微软的outlook带来新生。今年Xobni获得更多投资,整合了 Huddle,并推出了一个把Gmail小工具移植到outlook的平台。年度移动产品:iOS今年出现了一种新的趋势:企业厂商往往在发布黑莓版产品之前发布iOS版移动应用。由于iPadå’ŒiPhone在企业用户市场的成功,很多厂商似乎把iOS看做是最重要的企业产品开发平台。Android今年也取得了进步,并且RIM仍然在企业用户市场处于领先地位。但今年的成功者无疑是iOS。荣誉提名:Good for Enterprise 苹果和Good科技已经在企业领域达成了密切合作。员工所有设备的增长给第三方设备管理工具提供了契机,但第三方设备管理工具正在成就员工所有设备的增长。年度开发工具:JackBeJackBe今年不怎么惹眼,但该公司旗下的Presto App Makerå’ŒPresto Mashboard等产品带来了最有价值的东西。JackBe减轻了IT部门的压力,给终端用户提供了创建数据混搭及其相关应用的工具。这些程序拥有企业级的安全,并可以运行在浏览器、桌面和手机等各个地方。然后用户可以在一个企业应用商店里分享这些应用。该公司客户包括GE,Random House和美国国防情报局。荣誉提名:Rhodes Rhodes(RhoMobile出品)是一个移动应用框架,可以帮助用户通过HTML、CSSå’ŒJavaScript开发跨平台应用。RhoMobile的独特之处在于提供了一个元数据框架,支持底层构架不断变化的程序和MVC框架。 年度数据库产品:HadoopApacheçš„Hadoop在企业数据领域增长迅速。Facebook、Twitter、雅虎都在使用该产品。IBM InfoSphere BigInsightså’ŒCloudera的云计算出品也基于Hadoop。 荣誉提名:CouchDB 去SQL化浪潮在今年达到了顶峰。CouchDB正在远离这种趋势,但它是推动企业级产品技术的重要概念之一。年度软件套装:Jive SBS今年企业社交媒体市场持续升温,思科、甲骨文、Salesforce纷纷进入该市场,而Jive守住了自己的地盘,不仅在分析报告上名列前茅,而其用户群也在不断扩大。荣誉提名:Huddle Huddle在今年获得了爆发式成功。2007年创办于伦敦,今年在旧金山设立办事处,并在美国市场大显身手。年度社交CRM产品:Salesforce.com社交CRM仍是一个模糊的概念,但顾问和厂商都认为这是未来。它由不同的部分组成:监控、参与、反馈、用户协作、员工协作等。你很难选出一家典型的公司。选择Salesforce并非因为其工具的强大,而是它有一个建立在Force.com上的生态圈,而且可以通过App Exchange访问。明年随着Jive应用商店的成熟,Salesforce将面临更多竞争。荣誉提名:SugarCRM SugarCRM功能和Salesforce差不多,但成本更低,虽然没有Salesforce的主机托管和升级服务,但SugarCRM依然有很多知名客户。年度微博工具:Yammer企业微博市场竞争越来越激烈,但Yammer今年表现尤其出色。完成了新一轮融资,用户突破100万,并扩大了产品线,和Jive相互竞争。荣誉提名:Socialcast Socialcast的新工具Reach可以把自身嵌入到其它程序中去。和SimplyBox类似,这让SocialCast成为用户非常熟悉的地方,而不用重新开辟场所。年度会议产品:Skype把Skype认为是一款企业级产品似乎有些奇怪,但Skype已经不再仅仅是祖孙聊天的工具了。今天Skype推出了商业服务Skype Connect,宣布和Avaya展开合作,并聘请前思科高管Tony Batesæ‹…ä»»CEO。Bates在思科的最近一份工作时思科企业、商业和小公司商业版总经理。大部分公司仍通过WebExå’ŒGoToMeeting等服务召开网络会议,但Skype提供了桌面共享和会议功能,收费更低,语音和视频服务质量更好。荣誉提名:Adobe Connect Adobe Connect今天推出了一些新功能,比如编写扩展的功能,其易用性受到了Gartnerå’ŒRed Monk的称赞。年度CMS产品:DrupalDrupal目前已经为白宫网站提供了一年多的CMS服务。这就是最好的证明。Drupal的开发者社区已有60万人。其背后的商业公司Acquia已经赢得了Fox Newså’ŒMother Jones等重量级客户。Acquia上月刚完成了新一轮融资,为来年做好了准备。荣誉提名:MindTouch 另一个开源CMS公司MindTouch今年收成不错。发布了注重管理和分析的新版产品,启动了销售指南和文档的市场,获得了Dachis这个重量级客户,并和富士通达成了合作。来源:http://article.yeeyan.org/view/pestwave/156710  此条目发表在 互联网业界 分类目录。将固定链接加入收藏夹。← 互联网产品是做什么?发表评论 取消回复电子邮件地址不会被公开。 必填项已被标记为 *名称 *电子邮件 *网站评论您可以使用这些 HTML 标签和属性: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> [...]

  12. [...] 荣誉提名:Adobe Connect Adobe Connect今天推出了一些新功能,比如编写扩展的功能,其易用性受到了Gartner和Red Monk的称赞。 [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
*
*