<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RFP Microformat?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/31/rfp-microformat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/31/rfp-microformat/</link>
	<description>One foot in the muck, the other in utopia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 08:23:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Marks</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/31/rfp-microformat/comment-page-1/#comment-7687</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Marks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/31/rfp-microformat/#comment-7687</guid>
		<description>A microformat would require following the process first -looking at how poeple currently express such ideas. Doc Searls&#039;s VRM project is discussing these ideas.
http://projectvrm.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A microformat would require following the process first -looking at how poeple currently express such ideas. Doc Searls&#8217;s VRM project is discussing these ideas.<br />
<a href="http://projectvrm.org" rel="nofollow">http://projectvrm.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cote</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/31/rfp-microformat/comment-page-1/#comment-7571</link>
		<dc:creator>cote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/31/rfp-microformat/#comment-7571</guid>
		<description>Not being one who writes a lot of RFPs, I don&#039;t really know off the top of my head. At the Sun Analyst Summit, I had several conversations about hammering out the details from their side. 
 
I&#039;d think we could just ask both the buy and sell side which attributes they&#039;d want. And choose a narrow subset (maybe based on buying servers?) of that. 
 
[Insert hand waving.] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not being one who writes a lot of RFPs, I don&#039;t really know off the top of my head. At the Sun Analyst Summit, I had several conversations about hammering out the details from their side.</p>
<p>I&#039;d think we could just ask both the buy and sell side which attributes they&#039;d want. And choose a narrow subset (maybe based on buying servers?) of that.</p>
<p>[Insert hand waving.] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill de hOra</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/31/rfp-microformat/comment-page-1/#comment-7489</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill de hOra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/31/rfp-microformat/#comment-7489</guid>
		<description>&quot;RFPs exhibit highly variance&quot; 
 
Um, &#039;RFPs exhibit high variance&#039;.  
 
[The rioja, it speaks in riddles!] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;RFPs exhibit highly variance&quot;</p>
<p>Um, &#039;RFPs exhibit high variance&#039;. </p>
<p>[The rioja, it speaks in riddles!] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill de hOra</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/31/rfp-microformat/comment-page-1/#comment-7488</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill de hOra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/31/rfp-microformat/#comment-7488</guid>
		<description>&quot;Seriously though, if we can hammer out the fields we&#8217;d need, it&#8217;d be &#8220;easy&#8221; enough to come up with a 0.1 version of the RFP microformat.&quot; 
 
Any samples? part of me says that RFPs exhibit highly variance. But maybe you&#039;re talking about excerpts/highlines for RFPs? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Seriously though, if we can hammer out the fields we&rsquo;d need, it&rsquo;d be &ldquo;easy&rdquo; enough to come up with a 0.1 version of the RFP microformat.&quot;</p>
<p>Any samples? part of me says that RFPs exhibit highly variance. But maybe you&#039;re talking about excerpts/highlines for RFPs? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cote</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/31/rfp-microformat/comment-page-1/#comment-5506</link>
		<dc:creator>cote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 17:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/31/rfp-microformat/#comment-5506</guid>
		<description>Graham: I&#039;ll have to check that out. Thanks! 
 
BillSaysThis: yup, I agree. I just need to figure out the first set of attributes. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Graham: I&#039;ll have to check that out. Thanks!</p>
<p>BillSaysThis: yup, I agree. I just need to figure out the first set of attributes. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Governor&#8217;s Monkchips &#187; A RedMonk Service: match-making smartups and suppliers?</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/31/rfp-microformat/comment-page-1/#comment-5434</link>
		<dc:creator>James Governor&#8217;s Monkchips &#187; A RedMonk Service: match-making smartups and suppliers?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 12:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/31/rfp-microformat/#comment-5434</guid>
		<description>[...] One way we might move forward with such a service would be to subset and augment an aggregated online RFP microformat service. The data would be free for technorati style aggregation, while RedMonk&#8217;s edge would be our relationships with the folks that wanted something, or could supply something, or the the new opportunities we saw. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One way we might move forward with such a service would be to subset and augment an aggregated online RFP microformat service. The data would be free for technorati style aggregation, while RedMonk&#8217;s edge would be our relationships with the folks that wanted something, or could supply something, or the the new opportunities we saw. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillSaysThis</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/31/rfp-microformat/comment-page-1/#comment-5477</link>
		<dc:creator>BillSaysThis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 12:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/31/rfp-microformat/#comment-5477</guid>
		<description>Microformats.org is a wiki and that crew are very open and responsive, so why don&#039;t you just open a page with your draft proposal and see what happens? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microformats.org is a wiki and that crew are very open and responsive, so why don&#039;t you just open a page with your draft proposal and see what happens? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/31/rfp-microformat/comment-page-1/#comment-5448</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/31/rfp-microformat/#comment-5448</guid>
		<description>Interesting idea. I wonder how this would play in the Proposal Automation market? (e.g., Pragmatech.com) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting idea. I wonder how this would play in the Proposal Automation market? (e.g., Pragmatech.com) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tecosystems &#187; links for 2007-02-01</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/31/rfp-microformat/comment-page-1/#comment-5369</link>
		<dc:creator>tecosystems &#187; links for 2007-02-01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 05:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/31/rfp-microformat/#comment-5369</guid>
		<description>[...] People Over Process Â» Blog Archive Â» RFP Microformat? love the idea (tags: RFP microformat Technorati Cote Governor RedMonk) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] People Over Process Â» Blog Archive Â» RFP Microformat? love the idea (tags: RFP microformat Technorati Cote Governor RedMonk) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Governor</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/31/rfp-microformat/comment-page-1/#comment-5408</link>
		<dc:creator>James Governor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 03:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/31/rfp-microformat/#comment-5408</guid>
		<description>well i called it and now the snowball is rolling downhill. even SOG thinks its an interesting idea. It would be an interesting way to completely change our industry wouldn&#039;t it? Analysts as RFP mediators... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well i called it and now the snowball is rolling downhill. even SOG thinks its an interesting idea. It would be an interesting way to completely change our industry wouldn&#039;t it? Analysts as RFP mediators&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

