<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Switching Aggregators?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/18/switching-aggregators/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/18/switching-aggregators/</link>
	<description>One foot in the muck, the other in utopia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 08:23:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cote</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/18/switching-aggregators/comment-page-1/#comment-3731</link>
		<dc:creator>cote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 18:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/18/switching-aggregators/#comment-3731</guid>
		<description>No problem, Pito. Thanks for the link ;) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problem, Pito. Thanks for the link ;) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pito Salas</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/18/switching-aggregators/comment-page-1/#comment-3728</link>
		<dc:creator>Pito Salas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 17:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/18/switching-aggregators/#comment-3728</guid>
		<description>I hope it&#039;s not offensive to plug my own product, but have you checked out BlogBridge, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blogbridge.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.blogbridge.com&lt;/a&gt; - open source, mac, windows and linux, free, desktop aggregator - with a free service to keep multiple copies in sync. Please write me if I can shed more light! Thanks. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope it&#039;s not offensive to plug my own product, but have you checked out BlogBridge, <a href="http://www.blogbridge.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.blogbridge.com</a> &#8211; open source, mac, windows and linux, free, desktop aggregator &#8211; with a free service to keep multiple copies in sync. Please write me if I can shed more light! Thanks. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cote</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/18/switching-aggregators/comment-page-1/#comment-3550</link>
		<dc:creator>cote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/18/switching-aggregators/#comment-3550</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the recommendations! NetNewsWire did actually work out all right. I&#039;m using NewsFire at the moment (I went ahead and bought it to test out more feeds). 

NetNewsWire seems to &quot;just work&quot; and it scaled up to the &lt;i&gt;initial&lt;/i&gt;number of feeds and items I had (about 4,000). I didn&#039;t test it working with 14,000 which was where Vienna started slowing down.

Like I said, I&#039;m using NewsFire now. Why? Because I&#039;m willing to try out gadgets and new things. It really annoys me that I can&#039;t manually order the feeds (FeedLounge had the same problem), but I&#039;m trying to like the way it &quot;wants&quot; me to read feeds: newest first.

There&#039;s actually quite a lot of advantage to ordering feeds, esp. when you subscribe to comments for feeds. It&#039;s silly to read comments before you read the feed item they&#039;re commenting on.

So, I&#039;ll give NewsFire a few more days, but if it&#039;s lack of manual ordering gets on my nerves, I&#039;ll probably load up NetNewsWire.

NewsFire is fast, though. That much is nice. And, of course, it looks great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the recommendations! NetNewsWire did actually work out all right. I&#8217;m using NewsFire at the moment (I went ahead and bought it to test out more feeds). </p>
<p>NetNewsWire seems to &#8220;just work&#8221; and it scaled up to the <i>initial</i>number of feeds and items I had (about 4,000). I didn&#8217;t test it working with 14,000 which was where Vienna started slowing down.</p>
<p>Like I said, I&#8217;m using NewsFire now. Why? Because I&#8217;m willing to try out gadgets and new things. It really annoys me that I can&#8217;t manually order the feeds (FeedLounge had the same problem), but I&#8217;m trying to like the way it &#8220;wants&#8221; me to read feeds: newest first.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s actually quite a lot of advantage to ordering feeds, esp. when you subscribe to comments for feeds. It&#8217;s silly to read comments before you read the feed item they&#8217;re commenting on.</p>
<p>So, I&#8217;ll give NewsFire a few more days, but if it&#8217;s lack of manual ordering gets on my nerves, I&#8217;ll probably load up NetNewsWire.</p>
<p>NewsFire is fast, though. That much is nice. And, of course, it looks great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/18/switching-aggregators/comment-page-1/#comment-3548</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/18/switching-aggregators/#comment-3548</guid>
		<description>What do folks think of NewsFire? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsfirerss.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.newsfirerss.com/&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do folks think of NewsFire? <a href="http://www.newsfirerss.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.newsfirerss.com/</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Hildebrand</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/18/switching-aggregators/comment-page-1/#comment-3481</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Hildebrand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/18/switching-aggregators/#comment-3481</guid>
		<description>Another vote for NNW.  I haven&#039;t had speed problems with a couple hundred subscriptions and thousands of unreads.  A couple of suggestions:

Try several styles util you find one you like.  I&#039;m using Ollicle Reflex (http://tinyurl.com/2qvgs9) at the moment. 

Try using groups as precendence bundles.  I have several groups, each of which contain several feeds.  I order the groups in the order of the importance of the feeds therein, so I can always be up-to-date on the most important stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another vote for NNW.  I haven&#8217;t had speed problems with a couple hundred subscriptions and thousands of unreads.  A couple of suggestions:</p>
<p>Try several styles util you find one you like.  I&#8217;m using Ollicle Reflex (<a href="http://tinyurl.com/2qvgs9" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/2qvgs9</a>) at the moment. </p>
<p>Try using groups as precendence bundles.  I have several groups, each of which contain several feeds.  I order the groups in the order of the importance of the feeds therein, so I can always be up-to-date on the most important stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/18/switching-aggregators/comment-page-1/#comment-3479</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/18/switching-aggregators/#comment-3479</guid>
		<description>I was hoping you might fare better than I did with Vienna. I started using it again about the same time you did, but after a couple weeks it started to crumble when faced with several hundred feeds. So I gave NetNewsWire another shot, but once again it just got too slow after a few weeks, mostly at startup. Not to mention difficult to organize. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rssowl.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;RSSOwl&lt;/a&gt; held up a bit better, but it&#039;s no slick Mac UI. Back to online readers for me. Let us know if you find something you like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was hoping you might fare better than I did with Vienna. I started using it again about the same time you did, but after a couple weeks it started to crumble when faced with several hundred feeds. So I gave NetNewsWire another shot, but once again it just got too slow after a few weeks, mostly at startup. Not to mention difficult to organize. <a href="http://www.rssowl.org/" rel="nofollow">RSSOwl</a> held up a bit better, but it&#8217;s no slick Mac UI. Back to online readers for me. Let us know if you find something you like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederic Jean</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/18/switching-aggregators/comment-page-1/#comment-3435</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederic Jean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 06:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/18/switching-aggregators/#comment-3435</guid>
		<description>I would have to second NetNewsWire. I have tried different aggregator (both desktop and web based), but I keep going back to it. I use the Widescreen View since it allows me to take advantage of the wide screen attached to my PowerBook. I hide the tool bar and use a modified Lucida Complete theme. As a result, I have a very clean interface. NetNewsWire performs extremely well, even on my (now aging) PowerBook. I am very happy with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have to second NetNewsWire. I have tried different aggregator (both desktop and web based), but I keep going back to it. I use the Widescreen View since it allows me to take advantage of the wide screen attached to my PowerBook. I hide the tool bar and use a modified Lucida Complete theme. As a result, I have a very clean interface. NetNewsWire performs extremely well, even on my (now aging) PowerBook. I am very happy with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raven Zachary</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/18/switching-aggregators/comment-page-1/#comment-3427</link>
		<dc:creator>Raven Zachary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 02:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/18/switching-aggregators/#comment-3427</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure it supports 350+ feeds. I must be close to that. If you&#039;re not running an Intel Mac or a Dual/Quad G4, the load time (beachball mode!) for the RSS feeds can be a bit annoying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure it supports 350+ feeds. I must be close to that. If you&#8217;re not running an Intel Mac or a Dual/Quad G4, the load time (beachball mode!) for the RSS feeds can be a bit annoying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niels</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/18/switching-aggregators/comment-page-1/#comment-3419</link>
		<dc:creator>Niels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 01:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/18/switching-aggregators/#comment-3419</guid>
		<description>and then I read your last paragraph.. never mind. : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and then I read your last paragraph.. never mind. : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niels</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/18/switching-aggregators/comment-page-1/#comment-3418</link>
		<dc:creator>Niels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 01:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/18/switching-aggregators/#comment-3418</guid>
		<description>Why a desktop feed reader? 

I recently switched from a &#039;home hosted&#039; lylina river of news aggregator, to Google Reader. Mostly for performance and availability reasons, and must say, the Google Reader rocks. I should have made the switch months ago. Tagging, starring, sharing and the &#039;new&#039; key driven interface make for quick and easy reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why a desktop feed reader? </p>
<p>I recently switched from a &#8216;home hosted&#8217; lylina river of news aggregator, to Google Reader. Mostly for performance and availability reasons, and must say, the Google Reader rocks. I should have made the switch months ago. Tagging, starring, sharing and the &#8216;new&#8217; key driven interface make for quick and easy reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

