<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Platforms in Systems Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/16/open-platforms-in-systems-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/16/open-platforms-in-systems-management/</link>
	<description>One foot in the muck, the other in utopia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 08:23:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ç”µå­å•†åŠ¡ç³»ç»Ÿä¹‹ç½‘ç»œç®¡ç† &#171; å‡ºå®¶å¦‚åˆ,æˆä½›æœ‰ä½™</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/16/open-platforms-in-systems-management/comment-page-1/#comment-342448</link>
		<dc:creator>ç”µå­å•†åŠ¡ç³»ç»Ÿä¹‹ç½‘ç»œç®¡ç† &#171; å‡ºå®¶å¦‚åˆ,æˆä½›æœ‰ä½™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 13:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/16/open-platforms-in-systems-management/#comment-342448</guid>
		<description>[...] http://redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/16/open-platforms-in-systems-management/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/16/open-platforms-in-systems-management/" rel="nofollow">http://redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/16/open-platforms-in-systems-management/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: People Over Process &#187; VMWare Buys SpringSource - Quick Analysis</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/16/open-platforms-in-systems-management/comment-page-1/#comment-336208</link>
		<dc:creator>People Over Process &#187; VMWare Buys SpringSource - Quick Analysis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 22:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/16/open-platforms-in-systems-management/#comment-336208</guid>
		<description>[...] out there, dear readers, is Hyperic, one of the open source IT Management vendors categorized under the infamous term &#8220;The Little 4.&#8221; One would think that Hyperic could help beef up VMWare&#8217;s ambitions to become more of a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] out there, dear readers, is Hyperic, one of the open source IT Management vendors categorized under the infamous term &#8220;The Little 4.&#8221; One would think that Hyperic could help beef up VMWare&#8217;s ambitions to become more of a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: People Over Process &#187; SpringSource Buys Hyperic - What&#8217;s the Hyperic Angle?</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/16/open-platforms-in-systems-management/comment-page-1/#comment-321596</link>
		<dc:creator>People Over Process &#187; SpringSource Buys Hyperic - What&#8217;s the Hyperic Angle?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 23:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/16/open-platforms-in-systems-management/#comment-321596</guid>
		<description>[...] in the market. They created a wikipedia entry on it even! They love the idea of being the &#8220;little 4.&#8221; Iâ€™m running out of ways to count the number of times companies claim an intent to â€œtake [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the market. They created a wikipedia entry on it even! They love the idea of being the &#8220;little 4.&#8221; Iâ€™m running out of ways to count the number of times companies claim an intent to â€œtake [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Telematique, water and fire.</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/16/open-platforms-in-systems-management/comment-page-1/#comment-239007</link>
		<dc:creator>Telematique, water and fire.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 15:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/16/open-platforms-in-systems-management/#comment-239007</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Bittman (Gartner) on VDC Infrastructure Management...&lt;/strong&gt;

Tom Bittman of Gartner has recently started blogging on cloud computing and virtualization. In a post made after the opening gun at VMworld 2008, he comments on two strategic shifts evident in the VMware story: infrastructure management (which he chara...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Bittman (Gartner) on VDC Infrastructure Management&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Tom Bittman of Gartner has recently started blogging on cloud computing and virtualization. In a post made after the opening gun at VMworld 2008, he comments on two strategic shifts evident in the VMware story: infrastructure management (which he chara&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Source Systems Management: Zenoss expands platform support, an interview with Mark Hinkle &#124; Commercial Open Source Software</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/16/open-platforms-in-systems-management/comment-page-1/#comment-185526</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Source Systems Management: Zenoss expands platform support, an interview with Mark Hinkle &#124; Commercial Open Source Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 16:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/16/open-platforms-in-systems-management/#comment-185526</guid>
		<description>[...] their comparative advantage relative to open source IT Management solutions, namely the &#8220;Little 4&#8221; (Groundwork, Hyperic, Qlusters and Zenoss), as earlier appointed by Michael [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] their comparative advantage relative to open source IT Management solutions, namely the &#8220;Little 4&#8221; (Groundwork, Hyperic, Qlusters and Zenoss), as earlier appointed by Michael [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Vambenepe&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; System Center &#8220;Cross Platform Extension&#8221;: too many distractions</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/16/open-platforms-in-systems-management/comment-page-1/#comment-177062</link>
		<dc:creator>William Vambenepe&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; System Center &#8220;Cross Platform Extension&#8221;: too many distractions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 17:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/16/open-platforms-in-systems-management/#comment-177062</guid>
		<description>[...] the IT management world, there are the big 4 (HP, BMC, CA and IBM), the little 4 (Zenoss, Hyperic, GroundWorks and openQRM) and the mighty 3 (Oracle, Microsoft and EMC). Sorry [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the IT management world, there are the big 4 (HP, BMC, CA and IBM), the little 4 (Zenoss, Hyperic, GroundWorks and openQRM) and the mighty 3 (Oracle, Microsoft and EMC). Sorry [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chronicles of a Wandering Mind &#187; Business models for open source it management companies</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/16/open-platforms-in-systems-management/comment-page-1/#comment-173735</link>
		<dc:creator>Chronicles of a Wandering Mind &#187; Business models for open source it management companies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 02:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/16/open-platforms-in-systems-management/#comment-173735</guid>
		<description>[...] everyone agrees with the above statement.Â  There is a discussion that started with cote naming the open source IT management companies &#8220;little 4&#8243; as contrast to the proprietary &#8220;big 4&#8243; (IBM,CA,HP,BMC), and heated up again with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] everyone agrees with the above statement.Â  There is a discussion that started with cote naming the open source IT management companies &#8220;little 4&#8243; as contrast to the proprietary &#8220;big 4&#8243; (IBM,CA,HP,BMC), and heated up again with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zenoss Blog &#187; Greetings Zenossians</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/16/open-platforms-in-systems-management/comment-page-1/#comment-171790</link>
		<dc:creator>Zenoss Blog &#187; Greetings Zenossians</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 03:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/16/open-platforms-in-systems-management/#comment-171790</guid>
		<description>[...] my last job was at one of &#8220;The Big 4&#8243; as a Java developer, I&#8217;ve been involved with the Open Source community in various forms for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my last job was at one of &#8220;The Big 4&#8243; as a Java developer, I&#8217;ve been involved with the Open Source community in various forms for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everything is a Freaking DNS problem</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/16/open-platforms-in-systems-management/comment-page-1/#comment-171382</link>
		<dc:creator>Everything is a Freaking DNS problem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/16/open-platforms-in-systems-management/#comment-171382</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Big Four, Little Four`...&lt;/strong&gt;

With Qlusters being &quot;removed&quot; from the Little 4 list I think there is room for a new 4th contender.
My vote is on either Reductive Labs or  Zabbix.

Where is your vote ?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Big Four, Little Four`&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>With Qlusters being &#8220;removed&#8221; from the Little 4 list I think there is room for a new 4th contender.<br />
My vote is on either Reductive Labs or  Zabbix.</p>
<p>Where is your vote ?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My New Gig &#171; The Shining Path of Least Resistance</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/16/open-platforms-in-systems-management/comment-page-1/#comment-170308</link>
		<dc:creator>My New Gig &#171; The Shining Path of Least Resistance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2007/01/16/open-platforms-in-systems-management/#comment-170308</guid>
		<description>[...] my last job was at one of &#8220;The Big 4&#8243; as a Java developer, I had a Linux consulting company on the side and I&#8217;ve been involved with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my last job was at one of &#8220;The Big 4&#8243; as a Java developer, I had a Linux consulting company on the side and I&#8217;ve been involved with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

