<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Buys JotSpot: The Nickel Tour Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2006/10/31/google-buys-jotspot-the-nickel-tour-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2006/10/31/google-buys-jotspot-the-nickel-tour-analysis/</link>
	<description>One foot in the muck, the other in utopia</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: People Over Process</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2006/10/31/google-buys-jotspot-the-nickel-tour-analysis/#comment-601</link>
		<dc:creator>People Over Process</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/wp/?p=454#comment-601</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;IBM SWG: Lotus "Ventura"!&lt;/strong&gt;

While seeing CMDB's auto-filled is thrilling, the most exciting thing I've seen at the event is IBM's "Ventura" project. I saw part of it in the labs session I went to yesterday, but one of the other sessions yesterday --...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>IBM SWG: Lotus &#8220;Ventura&#8221;!</strong></p>
<p>While seeing CMDB&#8217;s auto-filled is thrilling, the most exciting thing I&#8217;ve seen at the event is IBM&#8217;s &#8220;Ventura&#8221; project. I saw part of it in the labs session I went to yesterday, but one of the other sessions yesterday &#8211;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: driedtoast</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2006/10/31/google-buys-jotspot-the-nickel-tour-analysis/#comment-600</link>
		<dc:creator>driedtoast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 14:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/wp/?p=454#comment-600</guid>
		<description>"Can somebody tell me what kind of a world we live in, where a man dressed up as a *bat* gets all of my press?"

Sums it up the best I think. Google is looking for web applications that have gathered a decent fan base and has some complimentary features. Integration seems to be pretty good so far with their acquisitions but I wonder how long they can keep that up. 

One positive is that the people developing applications like jotspot are more inclined to help integrate faster than other companies. The key is having a company that is like minded and able to adapt. So far google has been pretty adaptable with their integration strategies. 

Do you think they would ever end up like EMC with a variety of acquisitions and no significant progress on integration?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Can somebody tell me what kind of a world we live in, where a man dressed up as a *bat* gets all of my press?&#8221;</p>
<p>Sums it up the best I think. Google is looking for web applications that have gathered a decent fan base and has some complimentary features. Integration seems to be pretty good so far with their acquisitions but I wonder how long they can keep that up. </p>
<p>One positive is that the people developing applications like jotspot are more inclined to help integrate faster than other companies. The key is having a company that is like minded and able to adapt. So far google has been pretty adaptable with their integration strategies. </p>
<p>Do you think they would ever end up like EMC with a variety of acquisitions and no significant progress on integration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ric</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2006/10/31/google-buys-jotspot-the-nickel-tour-analysis/#comment-599</link>
		<dc:creator>Ric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 04:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/wp/?p=454#comment-599</guid>
		<description>I know that Google has recently been viewed with more wariness than before, but their apparent preference for "open", real-web-based technologies is, in my opinion, a better thing than (as you put it) "forking the Web" like Adobe and Eclipse (in its RCP form)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that Google has recently been viewed with more wariness than before, but their apparent preference for &#8220;open&#8221;, real-web-based technologies is, in my opinion, a better thing than (as you put it) &#8220;forking the Web&#8221; like Adobe and Eclipse (in its RCP form)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
