http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2006/10/28/in-the-hopper-osgi-and-its-jsr-friends/ One foot in the muck, the other in utopia Tue, 02 Dec 2008 01:11:30 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2006/10/28/in-the-hopper-osgi-and-its-jsr-friends/#comment-596 Cote' Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:49:12 +0000 http://www.redmonk.com/cote/wp/?p=448#comment-596 Thanks, Sam! Indeed that episode while finishing up some house painting. I agree on the community angle. I don't know the OSGi community well enough to compare the two. That is, I'll have to figure out if the body that developed OSGi was "open enough" to qualify as avoiding one company alone setting the standard. Thanks, Sam! Indeed that episode while finishing up some house painting. I agree on the community angle. I don’t know the OSGi community well enough to compare the two. That is, I’ll have to figure out if the body that developed OSGi was “open enough” to qualify as avoiding one company alone setting the standard.

]]> http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2006/10/28/in-the-hopper-osgi-and-its-jsr-friends/#comment-595 Sam Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:22:58 +0000 http://www.redmonk.com/cote/wp/?p=448#comment-595 The <a href="http://javaposse.com/index.php?post_id=144211" rel="nofollow">Java Posse discussed this last week</a>, probably worth a listen. In summary, yes OSGi has already done this, but one company alone should not set the standard. However, they also seem a bit quick to rush to Sun and the JCP's defense -- but I get the sense that it's in response to anti-JCP histrionics. The Java Posse discussed this last week, probably worth a listen. In summary, yes OSGi has already done this, but one company alone should not set the standard. However, they also seem a bit quick to rush to Sun and the JCP’s defense — but I get the sense that it’s in response to anti-JCP histrionics.

]]>