<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Whither the Architect?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2006/04/03/whither-the-architect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2006/04/03/whither-the-architect/</link>
	<description>One foot in the muck, the other in utopia</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 02:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cote'</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2006/04/03/whither-the-architect/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Cote'</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 16:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/wp/?p=74#comment-142</guid>
		<description>Wither indeed. Man, I wish I'd thought of that pun. Good 'un.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wither indeed. Man, I wish I&#8217;d thought of that pun. Good &#8216;un.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ric</title>
		<link>http://www.redmonk.com/cote/2006/04/03/whither-the-architect/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Ric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 08:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/wp/?p=74#comment-141</guid>
		<description>.. or should that be "wither the architect"?

I've never had the impression that Agile meant no architecture - I always read it that someone had to know the picture frame into which all the pieces fit, and although the details may morph somewhat over iterations, the 'big picture' should ultimately achieve the desired landscape.

Maybe that's "some awful optimistic thinking" as well ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.. or should that be &#8220;wither the architect&#8221;?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never had the impression that Agile meant no architecture - I always read it that someone had to know the picture frame into which all the pieces fit, and although the details may morph somewhat over iterations, the &#8216;big picture&#8217; should ultimately achieve the desired landscape.</p>
<p>Maybe that&#8217;s &#8220;some awful optimistic thinking&#8221; as well &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
